GAO Report Slams Navy’s New Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers

The USS Gerald R. Ford is under construction at Huntington Ingalls Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia.

U.S. Navy

AA Font size + Print

The USS Gerald R. Ford is under construction at Huntington Ingalls Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia.

After delays and cost overruns, the USS Gerald Ford is now estimated to run $12.8 billion -- 22 percent more than planned, according to the Government Accountability Office. By Stephanie Gaskell

The USS Gerald R. Ford, the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, won’t be ready for its planned 2016 commissioning due to poor testing, construction delays and cost overruns, a Government Accountability Office review warned Friday.

The ship’s “technical, design, and construction challenges” of the CVN78, the first of three new nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, “have led to significant cost increases and reduced the likelihood that a fully functional ship will be delivered on time,” the GAO said. “The Navy has achieved mixed progress to date developing CVN 78’s critical technologies, such as a system intended to more effectively launch aircraft from the ship.”

Meeting the 2016 deadline for commissioning the ship also will prove difficult, the GAO said. “Progress in constructing CVN 78 has been overshadowed by inefficient out-of-sequence work, driven largely by material shortfalls, engineering challenges and delays developing and installing critical technology systems. These events are occurring in a constrained budget environment, even as lead ship costs have increased by over 22 percent since construction authorization in fiscal year 2008 — to $12.8 billion. Additional increases could follow due to uncertainties facing critical technology systems and shipbuilder underperformance.”

Delays and cost overruns for the USS Gerald R. Ford also threaten construction of the USS John F. Kennedy, the second of the Ford-class ships. GAO scoffed at the Pentagon’s cost estimate for the CVN 79 as “optimistic.”

The Ford-class ships are designed to give the Navy the ability to fly more aircraft on more missions than earlier carriers, boost margins for weight and stability so the ship’s contents can be reconfigured over its lifetime and has nearly three times the electrical generating capability. The Pentagon is spending $43 billion to build three of them.

In its response, the Navy said some of the findings of the GAO report were “overstated” but agreed to rework its testing schedule for the CVN 78, which is set for delivery in 2016, but won’t be deployable until 2019.

Read the full GAO report here.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.