How a 2009 Law Is Protecting Veterans from the Government Shutdown

President Obama and congressional leaders signing the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act

Rep. Nancy Pelosi

AA Font size + Print

President Obama and congressional leaders signing the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act

Veterans advocates fought hard to pass a 2009 law that helps protect their benefits from congressional gridlock. Now it’s paying off. By Tom Tarantino

While veterans will not be immune to a government shutdown, the pain will be significantly mitigated by a new law passed in 2009 that is intended to protect veterans’ hard-earned benefits in the event that Congress came to another standstill over the budget.

In 2009, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law a bill to begin funding Department of Veterans Affairs medical accounts one year in advance. This “advanced appropriation” ensures timely and predictable funding for VA hospitals and clinics, which serve 9 million veterans across the country. But it also guards the nation’s veterans from the effects of congressional gridlock.

The latest political fight and the possibility of a government shutdown illustrates why advanced appropriations was a major public policy priority for the veterans community, including Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, which made it the focal point of our 2009 “Storm the Hill” advocacy campaign. The health care and benefits that our servicemembers earned fighting for our country never should be jeopardized by political fighting.

We have heard from many veterans rightfully concerned about how a shutdown would affect the community. Fortunately, because of the advanced appropriations and the requirement to provide mandatory benefit payments, many VA services are protected.

In addition to VA medical facilities and clinics remaining operational, veterans can also continue to receive counseling services and continue to have access to the 24-hour Veterans Crisis Line. 

We also expect that VA benefits would continue to go out to those who have been awarded benefits. Benefit payments are considered to be mandatory financial obligations of the government, and therefore payment is considered to be automatically pre-authorized and should continue during a shutdown. Also, employees whose work is necessary to ensure continued payment of these benefits are expected to continue working.

So that means that if, for instance, a veteran has a 50% disability benefit, he or she should continue to get disability benefits during a shutdown. If he or she has a VA pension, these benefits should continue to be paid. Existing benefit payments for the Post-9/11 GI Bill should also be distributed as scheduled, though new claims would be paused.

While veterans and their families are more protected than other groups in the case of a shutdown, that isn’t too say that an impact won’t be felt.

The government shutdown may threaten progress on ending the VA disability claims backlog. Since March, the VA backlog has decreased by almost 30 percent because of a renewed focus, new initiatives, and required overtime for processors. About 450,000 veterans remain in the backlog, however, and much work remains to help them and get the backlog to zero.

These efforts are in jeopardy if the government shuts down. In the past, the VA has been able to plan ahead to retain the large majority of the claims workers to process VA disability claims. Yet, because the VA will lose administrative support, claims processing may be slowed and all work processing appeals or new claims will stop. It is also unlikely that mandatory overtime – a key component of the VA’s major progress on the disability claims – will be continued under a government shutdown. 

There are other ways the VA and servicemembers will be affected beyond the VA backlog. The VA’s customer service hotlines will likely close, meaning that veterans’ questions will go unanswered. Furthermore, recent VA efforts to educate and enroll veterans about their benefits may be delayed.  

That any services or benefits will be affected shows why we need advanced appropriations to fund the VA’s full discretionary budget a year in advance. We must ensure that all VA accounts will have predictable funding in an era where continuing resolutions and threats of government shutdowns are all too frequent. America’s veterans have already paid their debt to this country and in return for their service, our nation promised them care and benefits to help transition back into civilian life. IAVA supports the “Putting Veterans Funding First Act,” which would ensure full advanced funding.

Even though the VA and veterans are protected in many ways - thanks to advanced appropriations and other statuary requirements – it is not fair to say that those who have and continue to serve our nation are untouched by the current debate in Washington.

In the future, veterans should be assured of all the care and benefits they have earned.

Tom Tarantino is Chief Policy Officer for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.