Hagel to Cut Hundreds of Staff and Contractors for $1 Billion Savings

Office of the Secretary of Defense

AA Font size + Print

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel says cutting 200 positions from his office -- and a lot of contractors -- will save about $1 billion by 2019. By Stephanie Gaskell

The Office of the Secretary of Defense will get smaller over the next five years as Chuck Hagel plans to cut 200 positions from his office, saving the Pentagon about $1 billion.

In July, Hagel ordered a 20 percent reduction in the front office budget to comply with sequestration reductions. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, service chiefs, combatant commanders and 3-star headquarters will reduce their staffs, as well.

“Some of these savings will be achieved through significant reductions civilian personnel; much of these savings will be achieved through contractor reductions. We are still finalizing the details, which will be available when the budget is submitted next year. But we will save at least $1 billion over the next five years,” Hagel said during a press briefing at the Pentagon on Wednesday.

In addition to eliminating 200 positions, several departments will reorganize to “reshape and strengthen” their staff. The Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy will “re-balance” some of its workload to assistant secretaries of defense. The Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight and the Defense Privacy and Civil Liberties Offices will be combined into a single office, as well.

“We recognize that the dollar savings generated by the OSD reductions — at least $1 billion over five years — is a small percent of the sequester-level cuts, underscoring the challenges that face this department in absorbing these very large sequester level reductions. Still, every dollar that we save by reducing the size of our headquarters and back-office operations is a dollar that can be invested in warfighting capabilities and readiness,” Hagel said.

“Most of the reductions in OSD’s staff that I have announced today will occur through a process of natural attrition in order to minimize the impact on our workforce. If the department is forced to take the steep sequestration cuts on the order of $500 billion over the next ten years, we may need to implement additional reductions,” Hagel said.

There’s a lot of skepticism over the cuts, which Hagel said were meant to show solidarity with the rest of the department as budget cuts become the “new normal.” Although there’s congressional support to trim the Pentagon’s budget — some conservatives have pushed the Obama administration to trim the federal workforce instead of cutting into military personnel costs —  cutting jobs doesn’t always go over well on Capitol Hill.

“The Pentagon civilian workforce has been inexorably growing without adequate shaping or planning over the past decade. Worse, the active-duty military ranks have been targeted and reduced at a rapid rate since defense budgets started to fall. But the DOD civilian workforce has grown since the recession in 2008. There are now too many civilians and too little money to go around,” Mackenzie Eaglan, resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, told Defense One.

Still, Eaglen said Hagel is setting a good precedent by proposing to reduce his staff first. “Too often in the recent past, secretaries of defense have proposed cutting DOD bureaucracy without setting an example and starting at the top in their own office. The decision by Hagel to cut OSD staff is a welcome and long overdue initiative.”

Eaglen said she is looking to see if Hagel’s proposal is “just another efficiency initiative on paper. “While the intent is smart and necessary, this is far from reality and may never be achieved. Recent defense budgets have not followed the rhetoric of efficiency proposals to cut civilians. Nor has Congress been a willing partner in shrinking this particular workforce.” 

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    Download
  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.