Hagel Orders a Shakeup of the Pentagon’s MIA Recoveries

A team from the JPAC conducting an excavation in Mavea Island, Vanuatu

DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Barry Hirayama, U.S. Navy

AA Font size + Print

A team from the JPAC conducting an excavation in Mavea Island, Vanuatu

After revelations of mismanagement, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel gives the military 30 days to clean up its MIA command. By Kevin Baron

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has given the Pentagon 30 days to deliver a plan to speed up the often painstakingly slow and expensive process of finding, recovering and identifying missing remains of United States troops from previous wars.

Calling it a “top priority for the department,” Hagel ordered a top-to-bottom review of the department in charge of finding and recovering the remains of fallen troops around the world. He also called for a streamlining of the Defense Department’s overlapping and duplicative organizations led by the Hawaii-based Joint POW/MIA Command, or JPAC.

“After intensive review, I have determined that the Department of Defense must change the way it manages accounting for personnel missing from past conflicts,” he wrote. Hagel said the recommendations should serve “to maximize the number of identifications, improve transparency for families, reduce duplicative functions, and establish a system for centralized, complete, fully accessible personnel case files for missing personnel.”

“In fact, we believe it’s a sacred obligation,” said Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby, announcing the shakeup at a press conference on Thursday. “We take it seriously and we’re going to keep at it.  We’re going to keep improving.”

Acting Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michael Lumpkin will conduct the review.

The mission to find, recover and identify the remains of service members – mostly from World War II – is a costly commitment. There are 73,000 unaccounted Americans lost in that war. JPAC said it believes well over 30,000 are recoverable.  But often JPAC identifies only a few individuals a month, from all past wars. There are roughly 8,000 missing from the Korean War. In 2013, according to JPAC, the command planned to conduct just 38 recovery missions worldwide.

JPAC officials send teams of troops and civilians, from helicopter pilots to forensic archeologists, into the jungles of Pacific islands, cliffs “over the hump” of Nepal, and fields of France and Germany. They chase thousands of leads by locals who find World War II aircraft and other remains regularly. Then JPAC officials choose which to go after with full-blown archeological digs that can resemble a scene out of Indiana Jones from Papua New Guinea to Vietnam. JPAC says it can costs on average $1 million to recover each soldier.

Now, JPAC’s mission to “bring them home,” which has become unquestionable gospel in American military lore, has come under fire as more lawmakers and media became aware of the high cost and slow rate of the recoveries.  Last year, a Government Accountability Office report criticized the organization for mismanagement and waste. In the fall, JPAC was criticized for holding “arrival ceremonies” – where flag draped cases are walked from inbound planes – that were staged, containing no remains. Soon, several media outlets were being told of remains being mishandled or misidentified, leads being ignored and other problems.

Private World War II aircraft wreck hunters and MIA search groups have long charged that JPAC was undermanned and underfunded but also was hostile or unresponsive to private ventures into foreign countries that might disturb crash sites or battlefield graves, risking the loss of a possible identification.  Unapologetically, the groups say they are succeeding where the Defense Department has failed.

For Hagel, who served in Vietnam, it is a personal priority.

“As a veteran himself,” Kirby said, “the secretary has an especially personal commitment to ensuring we account for and bring home as many of our missing and fallen service personnel as possible.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.