Dunford: New Pentagon Staff Needed to Meet Transregional Threats

Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the 19th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delivers remarks at the Boston Semper Fidelis Society Birthday Luncheon at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center in Boston,Nov. 13th, 2015.

Department of Defense photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Dominique A. Pineiro

AA Font size + Print

Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the 19th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delivers remarks at the Boston Semper Fidelis Society Birthday Luncheon at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center in Boston,Nov. 13th, 2015.

Today’s system of regional combatant commanders is ill-suited for broader challenges, Joint Chiefs chair says.

To meet the transregional threats of today and tomorrow, the Pentagon needs a staff that can look at regional threats and make recommendations to the Defense Secretary, Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford said Monday.

Currently, the lowest level of integration across regions is the secretary of defense, Dunford said at a national security forum co-hosted by the Center for a New American Security and Defense One. The perspectives and operational plans developed by the current system of regional combatant commanders are insufficient to face challenges such as militant extremism, he said.

“It’s my assumption today that it would be very difficult for any conflict to be isolated to a region,” Dunford said. “When you think about potential adversaries in the future, I think we need to think about strategy right up front that takes into account it is in all likelihood going to be fought in that way.”

For example, weapons like ballistic missiles could launch in one region of the world and hit a target on the other side of the globe. Under the U.S. military’s current structure, that missile could traverse the jurisdictions of multiple generals or admirals.

“I do believe that there needs to be a staff that has a perspective of all the combatant commanders,” Dunford said. That staff would provide “a common operational picture” and “frame decisions for the secretary of defense” for scenarios “that do involve multiple regions simultaneously.”

The Joint Staff, as structured, is not configured to operate that way, he said. 

Dunford also said he’d be open to changing the Unified Command Plan, which defines the boundaries of each combatant command. 

The chairman’s words are sure to feed the nascent debate over changes and updates to the Goldwater-Nichols Act, the three-decade-old legislation that created the combatant command system and forged modern jointness. His recommendation comes as the Pentagon conducts a review of the 1986 act and as Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has been holding a series of hearings that are looking at ways to modify the law.

Dunford is also looking to tweak — at least — the way his Joint Staff does business. It will shrink in the new year, he said. He didn’t specify how, but said he could “walk away” from some issues.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.