Afghanistan Growing More Dangerous for US Rebuilders

A U.S. soldier stands near his vehicle at the site of a suicide attack near a compound belonging to foreigners in Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, Jan. 4, 2016.

Massoud Hossaini/AP

AA Font size + Print

A U.S. soldier stands near his vehicle at the site of a suicide attack near a compound belonging to foreigners in Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, Jan. 4, 2016.

The Taliban now controls more territory than at any time since 2001, the inspector general noted in just one of many downward trends for a country now in its 15th year of fighting.

In the latest in a grim series, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction on Friday published a quarterly report highlighting the “fragile and worsening” condition of the economy and security climate in the war-torn country.

After a decade of reconstruction and a U.S. investment of $113 billion, “intractable insurgents, cutbacks in foreign military personnel, persistent emigration of people and capital, and a slowing global economy are shifting Afghanistan’s economic prospects from troubling to bleak,” watchdog John Sopko wrote in the report, which covered  the final months of 2015. “In this reporting period, Afghanistan proved even more dangerous than it was a year ago. The Taliban now controls more territory than at any time since 2001.”

Even worse for Defense and State Department program managers and auditors, “the lack of security has made it almost impossible for many U.S. and even some Afghan officials to get out to manage and inspect U.S.-funded reconstruction projects.”

The country’s large budget deficits and trade imbalances “will require substantial donor aid for the foreseeable future,” Sopko wrote, citing a Pentagon estimate that the Afghan economy cannot grow quickly enough in the next five years to cover a significantly larger share Afghan defense force expenses. Costs for 2016 are projected at $5 billion for a force that has seen its troop strength fall by more than 9,000 since May 2015.

In a pointed and detailed essay, the IG wrote that “neither Afghanistan’s security outlook nor its economic prospects are doing anything to inspire confidence among the population.” A survey of Afghans nationwide by the Asia Foundation showed that “Afghans are particularly concerned about security, and the proportion who fear for their personal safety is at the highest point in the past decade.”

The Kabul Passport Office, the report adds, is issuing more than 2,000 passports a day, six times the pace of a year earlier. Many applicants are young educated Afghans fleeing to the European Union.

The United States still has $11.5 billion of appropriated funds in the pipeline for disbursement around Afghanistan, the report noted. But heavy spending so far has produced too little in results. The U.S. Agency for International Development, for example, has spent at least $2.3 billion since 2003 on stability programs in Afghanistan. Yet a third-party evaluation shows that villages receiving money still score low on stability measures, and “some villages reportedly under Taliban control that received USAID stability projects subsequently showed greater pro-Taliban support. USAID appears to be largely indifferent to the implications.”

Sopko credited SIGAR itself with saving more than $2 billion to date through identification of waste, fraud and abuse. The accomplishments this quarter “bring the cumulative total in criminal fines, restitutions, forfeitures, civil settlement recoveries and U.S. government cost savings from SIGAR’s ongoing investigations to over $946.2 million,” the report stated.

Since 2008, SIGAR has referred nearly 700 individuals and companies for suspension or debarment based on evidence developed as part of its investigations.

More grim news is likely on the horizon. The watchdog has launched an inquiry requested by Congress on the U.S. government’s experience with allegations of sexual abuse of children committed by members of the Afghan security forces.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.