Obama’s Security Clearance Overhaul Lands with a Thud Before Lawmakers

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah,Dec. 17, 2015, during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

AA Font size + Print

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah,Dec. 17, 2015, during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington.

The plan, which tasks the Pentagon with safeguarding new investigations, appears to just be 'window dressing on a broken home.'

A bipartisan chorus of lawmakers on Thursday questioned the Obama administration’s creation of a new federal entity to conduct background investigations, criticizing the plan’s failure to make fundamental changes.

The phasing out of the Federal Investigative Service in favor of the new National Background Investigative Bureau appears to ignore some of the most fundamental problems with the security clearance system, members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said at a hearing to examine the plan. Administration officials defended the overhaul, saying it does signal a significant change and that it will provide more security for sensitive data.

“We want to make sure we’re not just putting a coat of fresh paint on a house with a bad foundation,” said Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla.

Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., echoed that concern, though he praised the administration’s decision to task the Defense Department with creating and maintaining a new information technology system in which the personnel data will be stored. Previously, he said, the Office of Personnel Management employed an “irrational system” in which a “human resources agency protected the nation’s most sensitive data.”

Still, Lieu voiced apprehension that the new plan may end up being “window dressing on a broken home.” Instead, he added, the system needs “significant renovation.”

If we’re setting up a new house, I want to make sure it’s not a house of cards.
Rep. Steve Russell, R-Okla.

OPM acting Director Beth Cobert attempted to assuage those concerns, saying NBIB’s creation will modernize the security clearance process, leverage Defense’s cybersecurity expertise, allow the president to nominate a director to oversee the background investigation system and boost operational flexibility. Aside from those broad brush strokes and emphasizing the Pentagon’s new role, however, Cobert did not lay out specifics of exactly how NBIB will differ from FIS.

The changes come after the dual concerns over both the screening process itself—which came to light after Edward Snowden’s document release and Aaron Alexis’ shooting of employees at the Washington Navy Yard—and the protection of personal data collected during investigations—which were hacked last year and compromised 21.5 million files containing personal information. The Obama administration and Congress have already taken several steps to shore up the security clearance process, but NBIB’s creation reflects the most dramatic overhaul of vetting and cybersecurity procedures to date.

Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., openly laughed at the officials attempting to sell NBIB as an improvement over the existing system.

“Folks, hang on to your shorts on this one,” Mica said. “I think we’re headed for another disaster.”

We’ll be back here in 2017. I guaran-damn-tee it.
Rep. John Mica, R-Fla.

Mica instead suggested background investigations be moved from OPM’s purview entirely, saying the checks should be contracted out “one bite at a time.” FIS already relies on contractors for a majority of background investigation efforts, as NBIB will continue to do.

Several lawmakers criticized the administration for requesting additional Defense funding to build out the new IT system. Obama asked for $95 million in his fiscal 2017 budget blueprint, which Russell said was “weakening our country.”

“We should find another way to pay for this,” Russell said. He also speculated that by breaking up the security responsibilities among different agencies, sensitive data was becoming more vulnerable.

Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, agreed.

“To grab this out of the troops’ budget is probably the last way to do that,” he said.

Cobert said she expects NBIB to be up and running by October with minimal disruption to the continuity of service. OPM will launch a transition team by mid-March to stand up NBIB and oversee the phase-out of FIS.

At least some lawmakers appeared to remain concerned.

“If we’re setting up a new house,” Russell said, “I want to make sure it’s not a house of cards.”

Mica predicted the new structure would indeed collapse, forcing lawmakers to go back to the drawing board in a year’s time.

“We’ll be back here in 2017,” Mica said. “I guaran-damn-tee it.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.