Special Counsel Goes to Bat for Two Defense Whistleblowers

Friend of the court briefs try to overturn rulings against retaliation claims.

The Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday announced it had filed two amicus curiae briefs challenging judges’ rulings that “restrict whistleblower protections for federal workers.”

In the appeals case Johnen v. Merit Systems Protection Board and Department of the Army, OSC took up the cause of Michael Johnen, who had complained to the independent agency that the Army had fired him from his civilian job in retaliation for his having disclosed alleged nepotism among Army officials to the service’s inspector general.

After Johnen refiled his complaint at the MSPB, according to an OSC statement, that board concluded that because Johnen had not informed OSC of the “precise” details of these disclosures, including exact dates and all recipients, he did not exhaust his administrative remedies.

The Special Counsel asked the Ninth Circuit Court to stake new ground and reverse the MSPB, saying the ruling “creates unwarranted procedural hurdles for federal employees alleging whistleblower retaliation” in a way not intended by Congress.

 In the second case — Ryan v. Department of Defense — Pentagon employee James Ryan alleged that the department retaliated against him for complaints about alleged personal misconduct by colleagues. An administrative judge concluded that some of Ryan’s disclosures were not protected because he was motivated to make them by “interpersonal squabbling,” not a genuine desire to report government wrongdoing, OSC said.

The brief argued that the 2012 Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act states that disclosures are not to be excluded from protection based on a whistleblower’s motive. OSC asked the board, even though it currently lacks a quorum, to “correct this legal error.” 

Separately, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the Judiciary Committee chairman and founder of the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus, on April 14 called on the FBI to update its internal guidance for whistleblowing to “bring the FBI in line with other federal agencies.”

His Federal Bureau of Investigation Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act became law in December. “Multiple internal communications to employees containing inaccurate and outdated information about whistleblowers’ rights under the law have occurred despite enactment of the new law,” Grassley said in a statement. “Additionally, the Office of Inspector General provided an updated version of employee training on FBI whistleblower protections months ago.  That updated training has not yet been implemented.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download
  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

    Download
  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.