Obama’s Foreign Policy Balancing Act

President Barack Obama delivered a major foreign policy speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point on Wednesday.

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

AA Font size + Print

President Barack Obama delivered a major foreign policy speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point on Wednesday.

In the post-war era, the U.S. will have to strike a delicate balance between interventionism and isolationism, President Obama said in a major foreign policy speech Wednesday. By Stephanie Gaskell

President Barack Obama’s foreign policy speech to graduates at West Point on Wednesday reflects the divided nation he leads. It is both cautious about retreating from grand ambitions after more than a decade of war and mindful of not looking weak to the rest of the world. The president walked a fine line in laying out his vision for the future, a world where American exceptionalism is widely understood, but our willingness to act militarily isn’t.

Obama illustrated the challenges of leading in a world where the threat to the homeland is real, but the enemy is often far away. The defense budget is being slashed, he said, yet the United States “has rarely been stronger.”  The U.S. is “one indispensable nation,” yet he cautioned not to “flout international norms and the rule of law.” Obama will use military force “when our core interests demand it,” but he said, “we should not go it alone,” making clear that America “should never ask permission” to protect itself.

“Today, according to self-described realists, conflicts in Syria or Ukraine or the Central African Republic are not ours to solve. Not surprisingly, after costly wars and continuing challenges at home, that view is shared by many Americans,” he said. “A different view, from interventionists on the left and right, says we ignore these conflicts at our own peril; that America’s willingness to apply force around the world is the ultimate safeguard against chaos, and America’s failure to act in the face of Syrian brutality or Russian provocations not only violates our conscience, but invites escalating aggression in the future.”

“Each side can point to history to support its claims,” he said. “But I believe neither view fully speaks to the demands of this moment.”

Obama seems to want it both ways. “It is absolutely true that in the 21st century, American isolationism is not an option,” Obama said. “But to say that we have an interest in pursuing peace and freedom beyond our borders is not to say that every problem has a military solution.”

Instead, Obama said there needs to be a more balanced, one-size-does-not-fit-all approach. He laid out a double-sided mission that projects U.S. power and global leadership but also sets the bar high for military intervention.

“By most measures, America has rarely been stronger relative to the rest of the world. Those who argue otherwise – who suggest that America is in decline, or has seen its global leadership slip away – are either misreading history or engaged in partisan politics,” he said, taking a dig at critics who say he’s been increasingly weak on the global stage, especially when it came to drawing red lines over Syrian President Bashar Assad’s use of chemical weapons last summer. Obama touted the decision not to intervene in the civil war as his own, saying it was “the right decision,” though it was Congress that, in the end, voted not to act.

Terrorism remains the biggest threat to the United States, he said, and even though the war in Afghanistan is ending, the fight against terrorists is not, especially in places like Syria. Obama said he plans to create a new $5 billion fund to help pay for the continued global war on terror.

“Here’s my bottom line: America must always lead on the world stage,” Obama said. “But U.S. military action cannot be the only – or even primary – component of our leadership in every instance. Just because we have the best hammer does not mean that every problem is a nail. And because the costs associated with military action are so high, you should expect every civilian leader – and especially your commander-in-chief – to be clear about how that awesome power should be used.”

Obama said using that power to help others strengthens U.S. national security. A key part of his goal is to rely more on diplomacy and other measures than the military. “When a typhoon hits the Philippines, or girls are kidnapped in Nigeria, or masked men occupy a building in Ukraine – it is America that the world looks to for help.”

“The question we face – the question you will face – is not whether America will lead,” Obama told the graduates, “but how we will lead.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    View
  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    View
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.