Congressmen Criticize Pentagon ‘Wall’ of Silence

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other senior leaders reject Rep. Duncan Hunter’s assertion that there’s an information barrier between Capitol Hill and DOD. By Kevin Baron

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other senior Pentagon leaders rejected a sharp allegation made by Republican members of Congress on Thursday that the Defense Department has erected a communications “wall” between it and the legislative branch.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., appearing at the Defense One Summit in Washington, claimed Pentagon leaders have refused requests by members of Congress for greater clarity on global threats, more issue briefings and general engagement with the Defense Department.

“I think it’s frankly an arrogance on the part of DOD and the part of military leadership, and not wanting to work with Congress,” Hunter said. The situation, he said, stems from the “strong executive branch” that developed in the post-9/11 era years and the actions of Defense secretaries who have served since.

“I think that there’s part of a wall that’s been put up between Congress and DOD,” Hunter said. “That wall exists today and is exacerbated by the current administration and just the political fighting that is going on.”

Hunter said the House Armed Services Committee had resorted to forming its own outside panels of experts because the Pentagon has not adequately briefed lawmakers. “What we need in Congress is that trust and honesty that has been lacking from the military leadership,” Hunter said, “where they come to us.”

Undersecretary of Defense Robert Hale, the Pentagon’s chief budget official, rejected the congressmen’s assertions in an appearance later on the same stage.

“I don’t remember at least myself nor other senior officials ever turning down requested meetings with members of Congress,” he said. “We certainly testify frequently.” Hale said the problem may be that DOD just doesn’t have the specific information members seek, or “frankly, they don’t like the answers they’re hearing.”

Hunter argued that the Pentagon was hiding its threat analysis, preventing Congress from overseeing national security strategy and preparing a budget to match it.  

The analysis “has been done, but it’s been kept from Congress and it’s been kept from the media,” he said. “The Defense Department doesn’t even know what it’s spending.” Sequestration, he said, is only exacerbating an existing problem.

Under such circumstances, “we kind of have the head-butting we’ve been seeing lately, and [we’re] unable to get to a real strategy that is clearly defined, where we know where we stand in the world and we know what we’re willing to put money into and what we’re not going to put money into.”

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., said that as wars overseas wind down, when Congress doesn’t give the military its full budget requests, DOD is uncooperative. “In some cases, you find …  that they’re not overly forthcoming when you try to ask questions, and I think that’s a relationship that needs to change.”

Hagel, appearing later at the event, said his time in Congress left him fully aware of lawmakers’ role in national security decisions.

“I have as much respect for … the Congress as I do for any institution certainly in this country,” said Hagel. “They — constitutionally, they are partners. They have to be partners, for no other reason than they control the money.”

“I can’t unilaterally — the president can’t unilaterally just make decisions on what we’re going to do without authorization from Congress, without the appropriations from Congress,” Hagel added. “Plus, you want the input from Congress. They are closest to the people. They represent this republic.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.