Congressmen Criticize Pentagon ‘Wall’ of Silence

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other senior leaders reject Rep. Duncan Hunter’s assertion that there’s an information barrier between Capitol Hill and DOD. By Kevin Baron

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other senior Pentagon leaders rejected a sharp allegation made by Republican members of Congress on Thursday that the Defense Department has erected a communications “wall” between it and the legislative branch.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., appearing at the Defense One Summit in Washington, claimed Pentagon leaders have refused requests by members of Congress for greater clarity on global threats, more issue briefings and general engagement with the Defense Department.

“I think it’s frankly an arrogance on the part of DOD and the part of military leadership, and not wanting to work with Congress,” Hunter said. The situation, he said, stems from the “strong executive branch” that developed in the post-9/11 era years and the actions of Defense secretaries who have served since.

“I think that there’s part of a wall that’s been put up between Congress and DOD,” Hunter said. “That wall exists today and is exacerbated by the current administration and just the political fighting that is going on.”

Hunter said the House Armed Services Committee had resorted to forming its own outside panels of experts because the Pentagon has not adequately briefed lawmakers. “What we need in Congress is that trust and honesty that has been lacking from the military leadership,” Hunter said, “where they come to us.”

Undersecretary of Defense Robert Hale, the Pentagon’s chief budget official, rejected the congressmen’s assertions in an appearance later on the same stage.

“I don’t remember at least myself nor other senior officials ever turning down requested meetings with members of Congress,” he said. “We certainly testify frequently.” Hale said the problem may be that DOD just doesn’t have the specific information members seek, or “frankly, they don’t like the answers they’re hearing.”

Hunter argued that the Pentagon was hiding its threat analysis, preventing Congress from overseeing national security strategy and preparing a budget to match it.  

The analysis “has been done, but it’s been kept from Congress and it’s been kept from the media,” he said. “The Defense Department doesn’t even know what it’s spending.” Sequestration, he said, is only exacerbating an existing problem.

Under such circumstances, “we kind of have the head-butting we’ve been seeing lately, and [we’re] unable to get to a real strategy that is clearly defined, where we know where we stand in the world and we know what we’re willing to put money into and what we’re not going to put money into.”

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., said that as wars overseas wind down, when Congress doesn’t give the military its full budget requests, DOD is uncooperative. “In some cases, you find …  that they’re not overly forthcoming when you try to ask questions, and I think that’s a relationship that needs to change.”

Hagel, appearing later at the event, said his time in Congress left him fully aware of lawmakers’ role in national security decisions.

“I have as much respect for … the Congress as I do for any institution certainly in this country,” said Hagel. “They — constitutionally, they are partners. They have to be partners, for no other reason than they control the money.”

“I can’t unilaterally — the president can’t unilaterally just make decisions on what we’re going to do without authorization from Congress, without the appropriations from Congress,” Hagel added. “Plus, you want the input from Congress. They are closest to the people. They represent this republic.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.