Karzai: No U.S. Troop Deal Before April Elections

Rahmat Gul/AP

AA Font size + Print

After reaching an agreement to keep U.S. troops past 2014, Afghan President Hamid Karzai now wants to wait until April’s presidential election to sign it. By Stephanie Gaskell

Afghan President Hamid Karzai reached a deal with the United States to keep troops past the 2014 withdrawal. Now he doesn’t want to ratify it until a successor is picked to replace him in April’s election.

Just a day after announcing that the two nations had negotiated a bilateral security agreement that would allow U.S. and NATO troops to operate in Afghanistan until 2024, Karzai told a gathering of Afghan elders to wait until the election takes place in April to sign the deal, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The agreement should be signed when the election is conducted, properly and with dignity,” Karzai told the loya jirga, a meeting of thousands of Afghan elders assembled to decide whether to approve the deal. “There is mistrust between me and America. I don’t trust them, and they don’t trust me.”

Karzai’s spokesman, Aimal Faizi, confirmed Karzai’s stunning statement, telling the Journal that “peace, security and a good election are key to the signing” of the security agreement.

Karzai also showed the leaders a letter from President Obama, assuring him that coalition troops would “respect the sanctity and dignity of Afghans in their homes” but did not offer up an apology.

Many Afghans have expressed worry that Karzai would try to influence the outcome of the election, and this latest demand quickly fed into those fears. “It came as a surprise,” Hedayat Amin Arsala, Karzai’s former vice president who resigned as senior minister last month to contest the presidential election, told WSJ. “This may be misconstrued as if the president wants someone specific [to win] in the elections. I hope that is not the case.”

The Obama administration is eager to get a security deal in place before the April election, and before next year’s fighting season begins in the spring. Still, defense officials have often said there is “time and space” to get a deal in place before the withdrawal at the end of next year.

The agreement gives U.S. troops immunity from prosecution by Afghanistan — the key sticking point that led to a failure to keep U.S. troops in Iraq after the war ended in 2011. The Loya Jirga is now debating the deal — and whether to postpone a decision.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.