Who Will Replace Rogers at House Intel Committee?

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

AA Font size + Print

Rep. Mac Thornberry is next in line—but he doesn't want the job, so Reps. Peter King and Devin Nunes are moving in. By Sara Sorcher

One of the loudest backers of the government’s spy operations is taking his voice from Congress to the radio waves. And already ambitious colleagues are vying to replace him.

Mike Rogers’s surprise announcement early Friday morning that he was not seeking reelection in November—and instead starting a new career as a talk-radio host—left congressional aides scrambling to figure out who might succeed him at the helm of the House Intelligence Committee. The unexpected vacancy already has attracted the attention of at least two other Republicans who may soon jockey for the top slot.

All eyes Friday were on Rep. Mac Thornberry, who is the second-most-senior Republican on both the Intelligence panel and the House Armed Services Committee.

But the Texas Republican has, so far, denied being interest in the job. “While chairing the House Intelligence Committee is an important job, my focus for the future is strictly on the House Armed Services Committee, where I hope to follow Buck McKeon as chairman,” Thornberry said in a statement Friday.

With Thornberry stepping aside, the line of succession is less clear. Rep. Jeff Miller of Florida is next on the Republican seniority list, but he already holds the gavel of the Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

With those two out of the picture, it’s anyone’s game now. But Reps. Peter King of New York and Devin Nunes of California have already jumped in.

It would be an honor to be considered,” King said in a phone interview. “This is up to the speaker [John Boehner]…. But if somebody asks me, I’d be interested.”

Nunes is being even less equivocal. “Rep. Nunes is interested in the position of chairman of the intel committee,” spokesman Jack Langer said.

King was blindsided by the sudden news that Rogers was retiring. “None of us saw it coming,” he said, adding that he is unsure who may turn out to be his competition for the chairmanship. “None of us have had a chance to talk to each other” about it just yet, he added.

Whichever lawmaker takes over the Intelligence chairmanship is virtually sure to have a big role in the debate over how to weigh Americans’ privacy concerns with the need for national security, spurred by Edward Snowden’s disclosures about the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephone and Internet data.

But Rogers likely hopes to end much of that debate before he steps down next January.

A fierce defender of the NSA, Rogers, along with the panel’s top Democrat, Dutch Ruppersberger, introduced a bill earlier this week to allow the NSA’s vast database of phone records to stay in the hands of the phone companies—and not the government. The legislation would allow the NSA to force those companies to hand over particular records before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court could review those orders, a key departure from the proposal President Obama is backing, which would require the agents to obtain those orders first.

King, who formerly chaired the House Homeland Security Committee, is another strong supporter of the NSA, advocating for an “aggressive” intelligence-collection program. “I didn’t think any reforms were necessary, legally or constitutionally,” King said, but the “political realities” mean he must support reforms in order to preserve the program.

The other Republicans on the committee are Frank LoBiondo of New Jersey, Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia, Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Tom Rooney of Florida, Joe Heck of Nevada, and Mike Pompeo of Kansas.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.