Ukraine’s Invisible Presidential Election

Two Ukrainian women walk past an armored personnel carrier in Kiev, Ukraine.

Sergei Chuzavkov/AP

AA Font size + Print

Two Ukrainian women walk past an armored personnel carrier in Kiev, Ukraine.

With the crisis in Ukraine's eastern regions dominating the headlines, the May 25 vote approaches, unnoticed. By Tom Balmforth

KIEVU.S. Vice President Joe Biden recently said that Ukraine’s presidential election may be the most important in the country’s history. But you wouldn’t know it on the streets of Kiev.

With one month until polling booths open, the threat of war dominates headlines. Election leaflets are rare. Just one of the 28 presidential hopefuls—Mikhaylo Dobkin, a marginal pro-Russian candidate—has placed campaign billboards in the capital. And neither of the front-runners are spending much time on the stump. Former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko has officially abandoned campaigning to turn her party into a “resistance” force. Petro Poroshenko, the chocolate mogul and favorite to win, has aired a TV ad—that he doesn’t even appear in himself.

“This is probably the first time in the country when a presidential election campaign is essentially not happening,” said Ihor Tishchenko, a sociologist and founder of the Reiting sociological group. First of all, it’s against the backdrop of war. Second of all, the candidates are practically not campaigning.” Overshadowed by Moscow’s annexation of Crimea and separatist brushfires on the eastern frontier with Russia, an eerie campaign twilight has settled over this country known for scrappy, mudslinging election cycles.

With the country frozen in post-revolutionary limbo until the May 25 election and facing the threat of war, many presidential hopefuls are trying not to stir the pot further as this traumatized nation waits for a polling day amidst threats from within and without. “Russia’s main goal is to destroy the elections and prove there is no authority here,” said 60-year-old Vasil Zolotoverkh, a resident of Chernobyl, who was on business in Kiev.

He spoke as Ukrainian authorities launched—and then abandoned—an operation against separatists in the east as Moscow ordered huge military drills on Ukraine’s border. Russia, however, is not Zolotoverkh’s only worry. “The alarming thing is that rivalry between the candidates themselves could disrupt the actual process,” he says of the election that, polls show, is essentially a contest between Tymoshenko and Poroshenko. “That is the real worry.”

The campaign had begun with signs of tentative post-revolutionary unity. On March 29, world heavyweight boxing champion and politician Vitaly Klitschko stood down from his bid for the presidency and threw his weight—and that of his UDAR party—behind Poroshenko. Poroshenko now has 32.9 percent of national support against Tymoshenko’s 9.5, according to an April 23 opinion poll compiled by four top agencies led by the “SOCIS” institute in Kiev.

And earlier this month, the front-runners crossed swords for the first time. On April 15, Yulia Tymoshenko declared she was turning her powerful Fatherland political-party base into a national resistance force to battle “Russian aggression” and forgoing a proper presidential campaign.

It drew criticism from Poroshenko who said Russia’s aggression is the purview of the national army and security services. The next day, flanked by venerable former security officials in the bunker-like conference hall of her party headquarters, Tymoshenko blasted her rival for campaigning. “Stop the trips to the regions with the dancing, the songs, and the circus bears and try to join in defending the country and use every opportunity,” she said.

Poroshenko and Tymoshenko were rivals for the prime ministerial post during the 2005-09 presidency of Viktor Yushchenko. Tymoshenko won that battle, but Poroshenko currently has a comfortable lead in this presidential race. Some polls show he has almost half the support of likely voters on May 25—nearly enough for him to win outright in the first round. Indeed, Poroshenko appears to be lengthening his lead without visibly campaigning.

Irina Bekeshkina, director of the Democratic Initiatives Foundation and a leading sociologist, said Poroshenko’s rise in popularity stems from appearing moderate in contrast with Tymoshenko. “After Maidan and all theses events, society wants some kind of stability,” she said. “It doesn’t want radicalism. In this sense, Poroshenko is a compromise figure.”

Poroshenko has made several trips abroad and has held relatively few stump meetings with voters. He has aired a campaign segment on TV—and yet, typical of this shadow election campaign, it features Klitschko speaking rather than Poroshenko. Residents like Valentina Tyzhnevayeva, a 63-year-old pensioner from Kiev, expects the gloves to come off after May 9—when World War II Victory Day is marked and when many are expecting “provocations” from Moscow that could upset the tense situation in the east or undermine the elections.

For others like Vitaly Zakharchenko, 50, who acted as a security guard during the Euromaidan protests, the elections couldn’t come soon enough. “I want the elections to take place sooner because then everything can then be resolved,” said Zakharchenko. “At the moment we have the same system we had under Yanukovych. There is embezzlement and theft. They give the impression they are working, but in actual fact they aren’t doing anything.”

The psychological exhaustion Ukraine is experiencing could be good news for Poroshenko, says sociologist Tishchenko. “This is a question of psychology in circumstances of war and psychological, emotional exhaustion which we are observing, he says. “First there was Maidan; then there was war; people constantly feel threatened. Subconsciously people want calm and peace. Poroshenko’s image corresponds with this desire.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.