Obama Picks Dunford as Next Marine Corps Commandant

Top ISAF Commander Gen. Joseph Dunford speaks with delegates at a NATO Defense Ministers Meeting on February 23, 2013.

Chip Somodevilla/AP

AA Font size + Print

Top ISAF Commander Gen. Joseph Dunford speaks with delegates at a NATO Defense Ministers Meeting on February 23, 2013.

The question now is who will replace Gen. Joseph Dunford as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan to oversee the end of the war? By Ben Watson

Gen. Joseph Dunford, the top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, has been nominated by the president to be the next commandant of the Marine Corps.

The nomination—subject to confirmation by the Senate—leaves open the question of who will take command of the roughly 50,000 U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan during a pivotal year as the 13-year war comes to an end.

In a statement, Marine Commandant Gen. James Amos called Dunford “one of the most knowledgeable and talented leaders and thinkers in the military today. He has commanded and excelled at every level.” He called Dunford’s service in Afghanistan” extraordinary and is testament to the full measure of the man. Our country and our Marine Corps will benefit greatly from his continued service.”

A graduate of Army Ranger School, Dunford, 58, served as assistant commandant of the Marine Corps under Amos, who took over from Gen. James Conway in October 2010. The position of commandant is a four-year term.

In Dunford took command in Afghanistan in February 2013, after Gen. John Allen retired. A Boston native, he also commanded the 5th Marine Regiment during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Dunford earned his undergraduate from St. Michael’s College and was commissioned into the Marine Corps in 1977. He holds an M.A. in International Relations from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy as well as an M.A. in Government from Georgetown University. 

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    Download
  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.