Afghans Will Learn Who Their New President Is, Probably, In Two Weeks

Afghanistan's leading presidential candidate Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai speaks for his allies, in front of the media representatives, at his resident in Kabul, Afghanistan, June 25, 2014.

Massoud Hossaini/AP

AA Font size + Print

Afghanistan's leading presidential candidate Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai speaks for his allies, in front of the media representatives, at his resident in Kabul, Afghanistan, June 25, 2014.

Former finance minister Ashraf Ghani looks to be leading, but 30 million Afghans will have to wait at least two weeks to learn who succeeds President Hamid Karzai. By Ben Watson

With 56 percent of the vote, Afghanistan’s Independent Election Commission announced former finance minister Ashraf Ghani led last month’s presidential runoff. But Monday’s results are not final, and the commission needs another two weeks to investigate seemingly endless allegations of election fraud before declaring a winner on July 22.

Ghani leads by a vote of 4,485,888 to Abdullah’s 3,461,639. The tally included results delivered from nearly 23,000 polling stations across the country—some on the backs of donkeys.

The results, expected last week, were delayed five days to investigate allegations of fraud lodged by both candidates. It is feared that Northern Alliance leader Abdullah Abdullah’s protest, in particular, could ignite a civil war just as some 20,000 American troops are packing up to leave by year’s end.

(Related: The Future of Afghanistan Depends on Local Politics—Not Kabul)

We cannot ignore that there were technical problems and fraud that took place during the election process,” Afghanistan’s current chief election commissioner Ahmad Yousuf Nouristani said at a news conference in Kabul on Monday.

A turnout of 8 million voters out of a possible 13.5 million eligible Afghans took many election watchers by surprise. Abdullah has since demanded a recount at stations where the number of women who voted outnumbered men, and his campaign has alleged ballot-stuffing and collusion between Ghani’s campaign and Afghan election officials. Abdullah also released recorded phone conversations alleging Afghanistan’s IEC chief encouraged election officials to tamper with the election in Ghani’s favor. The elections official denied wrongdoing but resigned anyway.

Abdullah dismissed Monday’s results pre-emptively on Saturday, saying, “When clean votes are separated from fraudulent votes, and from multiple votes cast by one person, then we will accept the result.”

But elections officials drew Abdullah back into negotiations with the announcement that nearly one-third of Afghan polling stations—including nearly 3 million votes—will be audited in the next two weeks, Nouristani said, following an agreement reached between the two candidates.

“For the sake of stability and democracy, we agreed with Abdullah’s team to audit and investigate 7,000 polling stations,” Azita Rafat, a spokeswoman for Ghani, told Bloomberg.

(Related: Dunford Expects Nearly 14,000 Troops in Post-War Afghanistan)

Afghanistan is slated to inaugurate its new president on August 2, and for many military planners the date couldn’t come soon enough. Both candidates have said they would sign the long-delayed Bilateral Security Agreement authorizing a reduced U.S. troop presence beyond 2014. There are currently nearly 50,000 international troops in Afghanistan, more than half of which—approximately 33,000—are from the United States.

Despite a relatively quiet election in terms of violence, the Taliban has applied significant pressure on the Afghan security forces in recent weeks—particularly to the south in Sangin, where a major Taliban offensive has displaced more than 4,000 residents and claimed the lives of at least 100 Afghan policemen who fought until they ran out of ammunition.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.