Senate Democrats Blast McConnell for Tying Cyber Measure to Defense Policy Bill

Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 2, 2015.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

AA Font size + Print

Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 2, 2015.

Legislation that has been long debated in the Senate is being jammed into the NDAA — and Democrats are furious.

Just a week after an emotional debate over government surveillance drove Congress to the edge, Democratic anger is again quickly mounting against Mitch McConnell.

Senate Democratic leadership wrote to the majority leader on Wednesday to urge him to back down from his “ridiculous” plan to attach cybersecurity legislation to an annual defense policy bill.

The letter, signed by Minority Leader Harry Reid, Minority Whip Dick Durbin and Sens. Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray, asks McConnell to not tack the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act on as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which is generally viewed as “must-pass” legislation.

Adding CISA to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in a manner that allows neither debate nor amendment is ridiculous,” the Democratic leaders wrote. “This is especially true given the President’s commitment to veto the NDAA for unrelated reasons. This is a pure political ploy that does nothing to advance America’s national security. We urge you to reconsider your efforts to jam through this important legislation in a manner that renders it meaningless.”

McConnell on Tuesday announced he would add CISA—which passed the Senate Intelligence Committee in March on a 14-1 vote—as an amendment to NDAA, noting the recent hack of the Office of Personnel Management that exposed the personal information of some four million current and former federal employees.

But that tactic has put McConnell under siege from Democrats, some of whom are generally supportive of the cybersecurity legislation but question the merits and motives of the majority leader’s process.

CISA seeks to cajole companies into increasing their sharing of so-called “cyber-threat” data with the government by offering them expanded liability protections, an arrangement the bill’s backers say could help mitigate and potentially prevent devastating cyberattacks. Two similar versions of the bill easily passed the House last month with bipartisan support.

Privacy advocates warn that expanded public-private information sharing could enhance the government’s surveillance capabilities, particularly at the National Security Agency, which will be able to access the data in or near “real time” as it migrates into government servers. Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy, Ron Wyden and Al Franken have both said they have profound reservations about the privacy implications of the measure and have attacked McConnell for what they say is an attempt to limit debate.

But even some of the bill’s supporters are lining up to excoriate McConnell’s strategy. Earlier on Wednesday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who for years has pushed for information-sharing legislation, accused McConnell of trying to stifle debate, noting that lawmakers on both sides of the issue “want an opportunity to offer relevant amendments.”

A number of my colleagues would like to propose amendments, as is their right,” Feinstein said on the Senate floor. “And I expect I would support some of them and would oppose some of them. But the Senate should have an opportunity to fully consider the bill, to receive the input of other committees with jurisdiction in this area.”

Feinstein also suggested McConnell’s move could imperil the overall bipartisan support for CISA.

Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr filed CISA as a second-degree amendment to another amendment late Tuesday, a maneuver that means it will not be open to further changes during debate.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.