Rep. Schiff: ‘Grave Concerns’ About Trump’s Relationship to America’s Intelligence Community

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. speaks with The Daily Beast's Kim Dozier at the Defense One Summit, November 17, 2016, in Washington.
AA Font size + Print

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. speaks with The Daily Beast's Kim Dozier at the Defense One Summit, November 17, 2016, in Washington.

The House intelligence committee’s ranking member cites the president-elect’s contradiction of the IC’s consensus views.

When Donald Trump proclaimed that “maybe there was no hacking” by Russia, the candidate was flatly rejecting the consensus of the American intelligence community — and that worries the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

“If he was willing to disregard the intelligence community and contradict it to his benefit during the campaign, will he do so as president?” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. “Time alone will tell, but there are, I think, grave concerns about that.”

Schiff, who spoke Thursday at the Defense One Summit in Washington, had just come from a hearing on Capitol Hill at which Director of National Intelligence James Clapper reiterated that the IC believes that Russia meddled in the recent American election.

“There is substantial concern about whether he respects, one, the process and, two, the personnel of the IC, especially when they tell him things that he doesn’t want to hear,” the lawmaker said. “As DNI Clapper said today, there is truly no question that Russia meddled.”

Should the U.S. hack back at Russia? Schiff said the U.S. must show that this is unacceptable and will draw a response. If Trump goes soft on this issue, he said, he will soon find the Russians hacking and distributing documents from his own party and administration.

“The one thing that gets Russian attention, frankly, is the sanctions,” he said. “We shouldn’t be talking about doing away with sanctions, we should be talking about adding sanctions.”

Asked about the reported appointment of retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as Trump’s national security advisor, Schiff began by praising Flynn’s work as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency with Gen. Stan McChrystal in Afghanistan.

“But I do have concerns about him as national security advisor, to be candid,” he said, starting with Flynn’s ties to Russia.

As someone who views Russia and its president with great anxiety, Schiff said, “It concerns me a great deal that the president-elect may be getting advice that reinforces his view of Putin.”

Moreover, he said, Flynn has, in Congressional hearings, demonstrated a tendency to “shoot from the hip.”

“Ideally, the president, who strikes me as having something of an impulsive personality, would have someone smoothing out those impulses,” but Flynn seems to share that temperament, he said.

Schiff also noted Flynn’s recent op-ed suggesting that Muhammed Fethullah Gülen, a prominent opponent of Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan, should be extradited to Turkey, where he would face possible imprisonment on political grounds.

He was asked about Trump’s suggestions that his administration may end U.S. support for Syrian rebels: What if Trump and Putin forge a solution that allows Assad to stay in power?

“I think the civil war churns on,” Schiff said. “As long as Assad is in power, that war will go on. It may take the form of a large-scale insurgency instead of a group that holds territory, but it will churn on…I think there will be a reputational cost to the United States, and further aggrandize Iran and Russia.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.