Trump Releases Long-Delayed Cyber Order

President Donald Tr, ... ]

Evan Vucci/AP

AA Font size + Print

President Donald Tr, ... ]

The order was delayed so security and modernization programs can work in tandem, an official said.

President Donald Trump signed a long-delayed cybersecurity executive order today that mandates federal agencies follow cybersecurity best practices and that top agency leaders be held accountable for breaches.

The order is broadly similar to a draft circulated to industry and cyber experts several weeks ago.

It was delayed, in part, to ensure efforts to modernize government technology are done in tandem with cybersecurity efforts, White House Homeland Security Adviser Tom Bossert said during a White House daily press briefing.

Trump specifically wanted to announce the formation of the American Technology Council, which he’ll head personally and that will focus on modernizing government information technology, before the cybersecurity order was released, Bossert said.

The order was also postponed until the president could release his budget wish list for the fiscal year, Bossert said.

That budget includes funding hikes for cybersecurity components at the Justice Department and FBI and for the Homeland Security Department, which is the government’s lead civilian cyber agency.

The White House budget is only advisory and will likely be changed significantly as it works its way through Congress.

The White House announced Trump would sign a cybersecurity executive order during his first weeks in office, but that signing was abruptly canceled.

“We’ve sometimes been criticized for doing things too quickly and now we may be criticized for doing things too slowly,” Bossert said, adding “maybe I’m right in the middle of the sweet spot.”

Industry’s initial reaction to the order was muted with several companies and associations saying they looked forward to reviewing it.

One key consideration for the order’s effectiveness will be the extent to which Trump follows through on his promise to hold agency heads accountable for security lapses, John Bambenek, threat intelligence manager for the cybersecurity firm Fidelis, told Nextgov.

“If you’re not going to face any real consequences, why would I spend time and money on this?” Bambenek said. “If the answer is the president can fire me while I’m addressing my employees and they see the news of me being fired on the TV behind me, that’s kind of a motivator.”

In large companies, “although the CEO is not a cybersecurity expert, he or she is ultimately responsible for implementing a cybersecurity plan that mitigates risk to the business,” McAfee Chief Technology Officer Steve Grobman said.

Another key will be whether the president fills top cybersecurity management posts at the White House, DHS and other agencies that will be responsible for assuring implementation of many elements of the order, said Betsy Cooper, executive director of the Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity at the University of California, Berkeley.

The order urges government agencies to share more IT infrastructure, such as financial and human resources systems, which can save money as well as make cyber protections easier to implement. Shared services will be a major component of government IT modernization, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Rob Joyce has said.

The order also requires a series of reports to the White House on topics including cyber protections for critical infrastructure, such as dams and energy plants, gaps in cyber protections for the electrical grid and marketplace transparency in the cybersecurity industry.

Another report will focus on the “scope and sufficiency of efforts to educate and train the American cybersecurity workforce of the future, including cybersecurity-related education curricula, training and apprenticeship programs, from primary through higher education.”

Former White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Michael Daniel described the order as largely in line with Obama administration cyber policy and as “more of a plan for a plan,” though the reports it requires are “good ones to have.”

“In general, I don’t see anything unusual or that really goes in a different policy direction,” Daniel said.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.