Old American Warplanes Still Scare North Korea

A B-52 Stratofortress deployed to RAF Fairdford, England from Barksdale Air Force Base, La., prepares to air refuel with a KC-135 Stratotanker from RAF Mildenhall, England over the United Kingdom June 11, 2014.

U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christine Griffiths

AA Font size + Print

A B-52 Stratofortress deployed to RAF Fairdford, England from Barksdale Air Force Base, La., prepares to air refuel with a KC-135 Stratotanker from RAF Mildenhall, England over the United Kingdom June 11, 2014.

The B-52 bomber might be more than 50 years old, but when it flies near the Korean peninsula, Kim Jong-un’s government pays attention.

Even though some are more than 50 years old, the North Korean government pays attention when Washington flies its strategic warplanes nearby, a top U.S. general said Thursday.

On Sunday, Jan. 10, just days after North Korea claimed it had carried out a hydrogen bomb test, the Pentagon flew B-52 over the Korean Peninsula in support of its ally to the south.

“Without revealing anything classified, the intelligence reports that I get on the North Korean reaction to the B-52 flying a low approach at Seoul say no, they do not shrug,” U.S. Air Force Gen. Paul Selva, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday at a Brookings Institution event. “They actually pay attention.”

Video shows the Cold War-era bomber flanked by a South Korean F-15 and an American F-16.

The Pentagon began deploying bombers to Guam, where the U.S. maintains a sprawling air base, more than a decade ago. The deployments have become continuous over the years, said Dave Deptula, a retired Air Force lieutenant general who initiated the rotations in 2004 when he was the director of operations at Pacific Air Forces.

“It has been a critical element of conventional deterrence of ‘adventurism’ exhibited by the North Korean regime over the years, and continues to be successful in that role today,” Deptula said.

The B-52 and B-2 stealth bombers that deploy there can carry tens of thousands of pounds of conventional and nuclear weapons. Despite its age, the B-52 Stratofortress has been upgraded with a suite modern electronic equipment so it can drop guided bombs.

“The North Koreans are very aware of the presence of the aircraft and the capability that they represent,” Selva said.

In March 2013, two B-2s flew more than 6,500 miles from their home base in Missouri to the Korean Peninsula. The planes dropped inert bombs on a South Korean training range as part of Key Resolve/Foal Eagle military drills between Washington and Seoul.

In recent years, the Pentagon has launched a project to replace the B-2 and B-52 with a new stealth bomber, saying it is essential for both deterrence and the ability to strike guarded targets anywhere on the globe.

“They’re going to have to be capable of going into some of the most complex surface-to-air missile defense systems that humans have built,” Selva said said of the new planes. “That’s the requirement.”

Russia has built and sold sophisticated surface-to-air missiles, including some that it has deployed to Syria.

“Any country that wants to compete with the United States has watched the last two decades pass,” Selva said. “They have gone to school on the way that we use airpower … to empower our joint force and they have built incredibly elegant and integrated surface-to-air missile defense systems to try and keep us out.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.