Hagel Wants Finance Ministers To Attend NATO Meeting on Defense Spending

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel talks with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen ahead of a meeting of NATO defense ministers and NATO-Ukraine Commission at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Feb. 27, 2014.

Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP

AA Font size + Print

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel talks with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen ahead of a meeting of NATO defense ministers and NATO-Ukraine Commission at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Feb. 27, 2014.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has a new idea to get NATO to spend more on defense. By Stephanie Gaskell

As Russian aggression over Ukraine heats up, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is once again calling on NATO members to step up their defense spending.

The message is certainly not new, but Hagel has a new idea to help nudge NATO allies to contribute more to regional security. He wants to convene a NATO meeting soon that will be focused solely on defense investment – and he wants defense ministers from each nation to bring their finance ministers or top budget officials with them.

Since the end of the Cold War, America’s military spending has become increasingly disproportionate within the alliance,” Hagel said during a speech Friday at the Wilson Center titled “Into the Fold or Out in the Cold? NATO Expansion and European Security After the Cold War.”

NATO members can no longer depend on the alliance’s most powerful members, like the United States, France, and the United Kingdom, to continue to foot the majority of the bill, Hagel said.

“Today, America’s GDP is smaller than the combined GDP’s of our 27 NATO allies, but America’s defense spending is three times our allies’ combined defense spending. Over time, this lopsided burden threatens NATO’s integrity, cohesion, and capability – and, ultimately, both European and transatlantic security.”

For decades – from the early days of the Cold War – American defense secretaries have called on European allies to ramp up their defense investment,” he said. “And in recent years, one of the biggest obstacles to alliance investment has been a sense that the end of the Cold War ushered in an ‘end of history,’ and an end to insecurity – at least in Europe – from aggression by nation-states. Russia’s actions in Ukraine shatter that myth and usher in bracing new realities.”

Hagel said NATO should stop thinking about defense in terms of just military cooperation. “Defense investment must be discussed in the broader context of member nations’ overall fiscal challenges and priorities.”

Including budget officials in NATO meetings “would allow them to receive detailed briefings from alliance military leaders on the challenges we face. Leaders across our governments must understand the consequences of current trends in reduced defense spending … and help break through the fiscal impasse.”

Hagel’s speech comes as violence in eastern Ukraine escalates. Ukraine’s Defense Ministry said two of its helicopters were shot down in Slavyansk, where the heaviest clashes have been reported. And the Associated Press is reporting that several pro-Russian separatists were killed Friday in Slavyansk.

The Pentagon recently sent 600 U.S. troops to conduct military exercises in Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia and Hagel has been meeting with several of his counterparts from Ukraine and other NATO nations in recent weeks to step up coordination and urge them to contribute more money to the effort. “Many of NATO’s smaller members have pledged to increase their defense investment. And, earlier this week at the Pentagon, I thanked Estonia’s Defense Minister for his nation’s renewed commitment and investment in NATO,” Hagel said. “But the alliance cannot afford for Europe’s larger economies and most militarily capable allies not to do the same, particularly as transatlantic economies grow stronger. We must see renewed financial commitments from all NATO members.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.