Medical Schools Need More Terrorism Response Training

An emergency manager from the 628th Civil Engineer Squadron tapes down the mask of an Airman during a simulated dirty bomb attack, Aug. 24, 2012, at Joint Base Charleston, S.C.

Airman 1st Class Chacarra Walker/U.S. Air Force

AA Font size + Print

An emergency manager from the 628th Civil Engineer Squadron tapes down the mask of an Airman during a simulated dirty bomb attack, Aug. 24, 2012, at Joint Base Charleston, S.C.

Despite a warning from experts more than 10 years ago, the nation's medical schools still have a way to go toward preparing their students for chemical weapon attacks. By Diane Barnes

A team of professors near New York City wants to make terrorism a larger focus for medical-school students across the United States.

A plan now taking shape would insert discussions of terror threats — such as a biochemistry-course lecture on nerve agents — throughout the four-year curriculum at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, said Leonard Cole, director of the school’s Terror Medicine and Security Program.

If a crowd of people suddenly begins “shaking and quivering and frothing at the mouth … it would not be a smart thing for you to run and try to help,” he said, referencing the symptoms shown by hundreds of people in last year’s sarin-gas strikes in Syria.

Cole said that kind of awareness is still largely absent in U.S. medical schools, despite a call issued more than a decade ago by an organization that helps to accredit them. Writing for the Association of American Medical Colleges in 2003, an expert panel declared that dealing with chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attacks should be “an integral component” of what medical schools teach.

The recommendation is “still not yet broadly implemented,” Cole told Global Security Newswirein a June telephone interview. “We want to inculcate in the culture of our medical school and our medical curriculum the notion that this is just part of what you have to learn to be prepared for. The kids, as they graduate, [now] really don’t have that sense.”

The proposal under consideration at Rutgers would insert talk about unconventional weapons and other terrorism threats into numerous medical-school classes, as well as its first-year orientation. Students also would have an option to take a final-year course focusing on such dangers exclusively, Cole said.

If we are successful, there’s no reason we couldn’t expect others to be successful,” he said. Cole and other school faculty plan to explore teaching recommendations in a series of medical-journal articles now under preparation.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.