Obama to Iraq: ‘We Can’t Do This for You’

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

AA Font size + Print

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

President Obama says any decision to intervene will depend on whether Iraq can take control ‘without resorting to war or relying on the United States military.’ By Stephanie Gaskell and Molly O’Toole

President Barack Obama said Friday he is considering military intervention in Iraq, but had a clear message for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: “We can’t do this for you.”

Obama said he will not put U.S. boots on the ground again in Iraq. The Pentagon is moving the USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf to prepare for possible airstrikes and Obama’s national security team is planning military and diplomatic options to put a stop to the worsening violence in Iraq. But Obama said he will not provide U.S. military might unless the Iraqis will stand up and fight and work to put an end to the worsening sectarian violence.

“This should be a wake up call for Iraq,” he said.

Any U.S. action, he said, “has to be joined by a serious and sincere effort by Iraq’s leaders to set aside sectarian differences, promote stability … [and] continue to build the capacity of a security force.”

In recent days, members of the al-Qaeda off-shoot, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, have taken hold of huge swaths of Iraq, including the key cities of Mosul and Tikrit and several areas near Baghdad. And Iran has reportedly deployed Iranian Revolutionary Guard units to Iraq to help fight ISIS.

Obama said the spread of ISIS “is a regional problem and it’s going to be a long-term problem” and one that threatens U.S. national security. “We’re going to have to combine selective actions by our military … with what is a very challenging international effort to try to rebuild countries and communities that have been shattered by sectarian war, and that’s not an easy task.”

But he made clear that the U.S. is not going back to war in Iraq. “The United States is not going to involve itself … allow ourselves to be dragged back into a situation in which while we’re there we’re keeping a lid on things … soon as we’re not there, people end up acting in ways that are not conducive to the long term stability of the country,” he said. 

“Over the past decade American troops have made extraordinary sacrifices in order to give Iraqis a chance to claim their own future,” he said. “The U.S. has poured a lot of money into Iraq security forces … the fact they are not willing to stand and fight and defend their posts against admittedly hardened terrorists … [indicates a] problem in terms of morale, of commitment, ultimately that’s rooted in the political problems that have plagued the country for a long time.”

“Nobody has an interest in seeing terrorists gain a foothold,” he said, but added: “Ultimately, it is up to the Iraqis as a sovereign nation.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.