Obama to Iraq: ‘We Can’t Do This for You’

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

AA Font size + Print

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

President Obama says any decision to intervene will depend on whether Iraq can take control ‘without resorting to war or relying on the United States military.’ By Stephanie Gaskell and Molly O’Toole

President Barack Obama said Friday he is considering military intervention in Iraq, but had a clear message for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: “We can’t do this for you.”

Obama said he will not put U.S. boots on the ground again in Iraq. The Pentagon is moving the USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf to prepare for possible airstrikes and Obama’s national security team is planning military and diplomatic options to put a stop to the worsening violence in Iraq. But Obama said he will not provide U.S. military might unless the Iraqis will stand up and fight and work to put an end to the worsening sectarian violence.

“This should be a wake up call for Iraq,” he said.

Any U.S. action, he said, “has to be joined by a serious and sincere effort by Iraq’s leaders to set aside sectarian differences, promote stability … [and] continue to build the capacity of a security force.”

In recent days, members of the al-Qaeda off-shoot, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, have taken hold of huge swaths of Iraq, including the key cities of Mosul and Tikrit and several areas near Baghdad. And Iran has reportedly deployed Iranian Revolutionary Guard units to Iraq to help fight ISIS.

Obama said the spread of ISIS “is a regional problem and it’s going to be a long-term problem” and one that threatens U.S. national security. “We’re going to have to combine selective actions by our military … with what is a very challenging international effort to try to rebuild countries and communities that have been shattered by sectarian war, and that’s not an easy task.”

But he made clear that the U.S. is not going back to war in Iraq. “The United States is not going to involve itself … allow ourselves to be dragged back into a situation in which while we’re there we’re keeping a lid on things … soon as we’re not there, people end up acting in ways that are not conducive to the long term stability of the country,” he said. 

“Over the past decade American troops have made extraordinary sacrifices in order to give Iraqis a chance to claim their own future,” he said. “The U.S. has poured a lot of money into Iraq security forces … the fact they are not willing to stand and fight and defend their posts against admittedly hardened terrorists … [indicates a] problem in terms of morale, of commitment, ultimately that’s rooted in the political problems that have plagued the country for a long time.”

“Nobody has an interest in seeing terrorists gain a foothold,” he said, but added: “Ultimately, it is up to the Iraqis as a sovereign nation.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.