Obama to Iraq: ‘We Can’t Do This for You’

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

AA Font size + Print

President Obama speaks to reporters on the situation in Iraq in the South Lawn of the White House, on June 13, 2014.

President Obama says any decision to intervene will depend on whether Iraq can take control ‘without resorting to war or relying on the United States military.’ By Stephanie Gaskell and Molly O’Toole

President Barack Obama said Friday he is considering military intervention in Iraq, but had a clear message for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: “We can’t do this for you.”

Obama said he will not put U.S. boots on the ground again in Iraq. The Pentagon is moving the USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf to prepare for possible airstrikes and Obama’s national security team is planning military and diplomatic options to put a stop to the worsening violence in Iraq. But Obama said he will not provide U.S. military might unless the Iraqis will stand up and fight and work to put an end to the worsening sectarian violence.

“This should be a wake up call for Iraq,” he said.

Any U.S. action, he said, “has to be joined by a serious and sincere effort by Iraq’s leaders to set aside sectarian differences, promote stability … [and] continue to build the capacity of a security force.”

In recent days, members of the al-Qaeda off-shoot, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, have taken hold of huge swaths of Iraq, including the key cities of Mosul and Tikrit and several areas near Baghdad. And Iran has reportedly deployed Iranian Revolutionary Guard units to Iraq to help fight ISIS.

Obama said the spread of ISIS “is a regional problem and it’s going to be a long-term problem” and one that threatens U.S. national security. “We’re going to have to combine selective actions by our military … with what is a very challenging international effort to try to rebuild countries and communities that have been shattered by sectarian war, and that’s not an easy task.”

But he made clear that the U.S. is not going back to war in Iraq. “The United States is not going to involve itself … allow ourselves to be dragged back into a situation in which while we’re there we’re keeping a lid on things … soon as we’re not there, people end up acting in ways that are not conducive to the long term stability of the country,” he said. 

“Over the past decade American troops have made extraordinary sacrifices in order to give Iraqis a chance to claim their own future,” he said. “The U.S. has poured a lot of money into Iraq security forces … the fact they are not willing to stand and fight and defend their posts against admittedly hardened terrorists … [indicates a] problem in terms of morale, of commitment, ultimately that’s rooted in the political problems that have plagued the country for a long time.”

“Nobody has an interest in seeing terrorists gain a foothold,” he said, but added: “Ultimately, it is up to the Iraqis as a sovereign nation.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.