Iran Talks Come Up Empty as Deadline Nears

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Iran's foreign minister Javad Zarif wait for the start of closed door negotiations in Vienna, Austria, on July 3, 2014.

Ronald Zak/AP

AA Font size + Print

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Iran's foreign minister Javad Zarif wait for the start of closed door negotiations in Vienna, Austria, on July 3, 2014.

After 5 days, negotiators have not swayed Iran over uranium enrichment levels as the July 20 deadline approaches. By Global Security Newswire

Envoys achieved few strides on Iran’s disputed nuclear program ahead of a stopgap deal’s expiration in less than two weeks, the Associated Press reports.

After five days of discussions in Vienna, Iran remains unwilling to accept all of the atomic restrictions demanded by China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States, diplomatic insiders said on Monday. Washington and its allies believe Iran’s ostensibly peaceful nuclear efforts are geared toward weapons development, and Tehran has tentatively offered to rein in some of the activities in exchange for an end to economic sanctions.

The sides reportedly remain most significantly divided on an acceptable size for Iran’s uranium-enrichment program under a potential long-term agreement. Iran has sought a robust refinement capacity with the stated aim of producing nuclear power plant fuel, while other governments have pressed for tighter limits on the technology capable of generating nuclear-arms material.

Israel, a regional antagonist of Iran, does not expect diplomats to conclude an agreement before the interim nuclear accord expires this month, Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said on Friday.

My estimate is that there will not be [a deal by July 20]. I think the Iranians came with a very hard line,” Reuters quoted Steinitz as saying. “The Iranians came without willingness to compromise but with a desire to exploit this stage to soften and improve the opening positions of the other side.”

Experts have warned that renewing the six-month pact now in force may lead to political complications.

Addressing how Israel would react to a long-term agreement it found unacceptable, Steinitz said, “We are keeping all options open.”

We will have to see what the deal is, to what extent it is good, to what extent it is bad, if it meets the minimum demands or not,” he added.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.