Ukraine Says Malaysia Airlines Crash Is No Different Than 9/11

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko visits the Dutch embassy in Kiev on July 21, 2014, to lay flowers and sign a condolence book in memory of the people who died during the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine.

Sergey Dolzhenko/AP

AA Font size + Print

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko visits the Dutch embassy in Kiev on July 21, 2014, to lay flowers and sign a condolence book in memory of the people who died during the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko drew the comparison Monday in an attempt to rally U.S. support against Russia. By Marina Koren

The Ukrainian president says he sees no difference between the downing of a civilian jetliner over Ukraine last week and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, calling the pro-Russian separatists he believes to be responsible for the crash “terrorists.”

I don’t see any differences from the tragedy 9/11, from the tragedy of Lockerbie and from the tragedy of Grabovo on Ukrainian sky,” Petro Poroshenko told Christiane Amanpour in an interview on CNN on Monday.

Poroshenko also compared the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which killed all 298 people on board, to a 1988 plane bombing in Scotland that killed 259 people on the plane and 11 people on the ground.

By drawing a link between last week’s plane crash and 9/11, the Ukrainian president is not trying to compare specific parts of the two tragedies, such as the number of casualties, the parties responsible or the damage, in dollars and psychological costs, they led to. Rather, Poroshenko is attempting to appeal to the American government and public for support in Ukraine’s standoff with Russia. The 9/11 attacks drew widespread international support to a country rattled by an unspeakable catastrophe. According to Poroshenko, the Malaysian Airlines plane crash, as well as the growing conflict in eastern Ukraine, should rally the same kind of support.

We should demonstrate a strong solidarity and to arrange the pressure for all of those who support the terrorists who prevent the independent investigation,” Poroshenko said in the interview. Poroshenko called the downing of the jetliner an “international crime,” and said the incident poses a threat to global security.

Poroshenko’s remarks are part of a months-long Ukrainian public-relations push to rally U.S. support, be it military assistance or sanctions. Last week, President Obama announced new sanctions against several Russian banks and energy and defense companies. If the latest punitive measures don’t persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to remove his influence in eastern Ukraine, Poroshenko says the U.S. will need to impose higher costs.

If sanctions will help [the situation],” we should introduce new sanction,” Poroshenko told Amanpour. “If it’s not working, we should maybe ask the United States Congress … to help us solve the security problem.”

Some members of Congress have called for more stringent injunctions against Russia, including imposing sanctions against specific sectors of the Russian economy, such as energy, or providing arms and weapons to the Ukrainian military. For now, the U.S. is sending investigators from the FBI and the National Transportation Safety Board to the plane crash site to aid in an international investigation.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.