Ukraine Says Malaysia Airlines Crash Is No Different Than 9/11

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko visits the Dutch embassy in Kiev on July 21, 2014, to lay flowers and sign a condolence book in memory of the people who died during the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine.

Sergey Dolzhenko/AP

AA Font size + Print

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko visits the Dutch embassy in Kiev on July 21, 2014, to lay flowers and sign a condolence book in memory of the people who died during the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko drew the comparison Monday in an attempt to rally U.S. support against Russia. By Marina Koren

The Ukrainian president says he sees no difference between the downing of a civilian jetliner over Ukraine last week and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, calling the pro-Russian separatists he believes to be responsible for the crash “terrorists.”

I don’t see any differences from the tragedy 9/11, from the tragedy of Lockerbie and from the tragedy of Grabovo on Ukrainian sky,” Petro Poroshenko told Christiane Amanpour in an interview on CNN on Monday.

Poroshenko also compared the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which killed all 298 people on board, to a 1988 plane bombing in Scotland that killed 259 people on the plane and 11 people on the ground.

By drawing a link between last week’s plane crash and 9/11, the Ukrainian president is not trying to compare specific parts of the two tragedies, such as the number of casualties, the parties responsible or the damage, in dollars and psychological costs, they led to. Rather, Poroshenko is attempting to appeal to the American government and public for support in Ukraine’s standoff with Russia. The 9/11 attacks drew widespread international support to a country rattled by an unspeakable catastrophe. According to Poroshenko, the Malaysian Airlines plane crash, as well as the growing conflict in eastern Ukraine, should rally the same kind of support.

We should demonstrate a strong solidarity and to arrange the pressure for all of those who support the terrorists who prevent the independent investigation,” Poroshenko said in the interview. Poroshenko called the downing of the jetliner an “international crime,” and said the incident poses a threat to global security.

Poroshenko’s remarks are part of a months-long Ukrainian public-relations push to rally U.S. support, be it military assistance or sanctions. Last week, President Obama announced new sanctions against several Russian banks and energy and defense companies. If the latest punitive measures don’t persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to remove his influence in eastern Ukraine, Poroshenko says the U.S. will need to impose higher costs.

If sanctions will help [the situation],” we should introduce new sanction,” Poroshenko told Amanpour. “If it’s not working, we should maybe ask the United States Congress … to help us solve the security problem.”

Some members of Congress have called for more stringent injunctions against Russia, including imposing sanctions against specific sectors of the Russian economy, such as energy, or providing arms and weapons to the Ukrainian military. For now, the U.S. is sending investigators from the FBI and the National Transportation Safety Board to the plane crash site to aid in an international investigation.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.