Why Congress Is the Biggest Obstacle to Stopping the Next Terrorist Attack

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas., listens during a House Homeland Security Committee meeting, on June 24, 2014.

Charles Dharapak/AP

AA Font size + Print

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas., listens during a House Homeland Security Committee meeting, on June 24, 2014.

The Department of Homeland Security, the 9/11 commission, even Congress itself say congressional oversight is out of control. By Clara Ritger

The committee established by Congress to advise the government on how to prevent another 9/11-scale attack recommended in its 2004 report that Congress get out of the way of the Department of Homeland Security and let its leaders do their job.

A decade later, that still hasn’t happened.

The Department of Homeland Security says that in 2013, its staff held more than 1,650 congressional briefings and had 161 witnesses appear at 105 hearings. By Homeland Security’s count, the hours it has spent to meet the demands of Congress cost the agency the equivalent of 66 work years.

It’s not just a waste of taxpayer dollars, says House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, but a misuse of the valuable resources that could be otherwise spent stopping the next terrorist attack.

Congress has not done its job and it takes away from the primary focus and mission of protecting the American people,” the Texas Republican said at a committee hearing Wednesday while holding up a map of the various committees DHS reports to. “This is dysfunctional. If you look up dysfunctional in the dictionary you will probably see this map.”

McCaul says he wants to lead the effort to finally put in place the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation to establish one point of oversight and review for the agency.

Everyone knows that when everyone is in charge, no one is,” said Jamie Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 Commission who testified Wednesday before the Homeland Security Committee. The commission produced a follow-up report this week to honor the 10-year anniversary of the original recommendations.

9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean said there was no one he talked to who didn’t say congressional oversight was a major problem impeding antiterrorism efforts.

Four [Homeland Security] secretaries now, two Republicans and two Democrats, have all said to us the most important problem they have in fighting terrorism is the Congress,” Kean said. “That’s their biggest obstacle.”

While the executive branch has undergone “historic change and institutional reform” over the last decade, Kean said, Congress has resisted reforms in a way that is counterproductive.

DHS staff are “not working every day on protecting the American people if they’re preparing and giving testimony to the U.S. Congress,” Kean said. “Could you imagine having 90 different bosses? How could you get anything done?”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.