The NSA Has No Idea How Many Americans It’s Spying On

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper leans in to read notes as appears at a House Intelligence Committee hearing on world wide threats on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 25, 2016.

Andrew Harnik/AP

AA Font size + Print

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper leans in to read notes as appears at a House Intelligence Committee hearing on world wide threats on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 25, 2016.

Lawmakers, who are being asked to approve FBI access to wiretapped data, want some basic answers first.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is watching the electronic communications of hundreds of millions people, allegedly to find foreign threats. But before Congress reauthorizes laws allowing this, it has a question: How many Americans are caught up in the government’s digital dragnets?

The answer, says National Intelligence Director James Clapper, is that we have no idea. “We’re looking at several options right now, none of which are optimal,” said Clapper at a press briefing in Washington DC on April 25. Security officials argue that analyzing the dataset would mean even more intrusions upon Americans’ privacy. “Many people find that unsatisfactory, but that is a fact,” says Clapper.

Members of Congress are definitely not satisfied. Four years (pdf) of prompting by US senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall to nail down the number of Americans whose phone calls and emails are being collected has produced little. The senators, along with colleagues, wrote an exasperated letter (pdf) to Clapper on April 22 stating, “We are not asking you for an exact count. Today, our request is simply for a rough estimate.”

Fueling the controversy, the NSA says it wants to start sharing raw communications data it collects with domestic law enforcement such as the FBI. That conflicts with intelligence agencies’ assertions that its programs are strictly to target foreigners. “Our employees are trained to not look for US persons,” NSA privacy and civil liberties officer Rebecca Richards told The Hill in March. “We’re not interested in those US persons. We’re trying to look away from those.”

Yet a secret 2015 court ruling (pdf) unsealed this week shows that warrantless spying has already been formally approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts for general criminal investigations in the US, says the Electronic Frontier Foundation. These revelations have prompted dozens of advocacy groups to write intelligence officials that they are (again) circumventing constitutional protections and “pose new threats to the privacy and civil liberties of ordinary Americans” (pdf).

See also Intelligence Chief: We Don’t Know If North Korea Has a ‘Boosted Bomb’

The worries focus on two core programs first revealed publicly by former CIA contractor Edward Snowden: PRISM and Upstream. These vast electronic listening programs—authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act—collect, sift and deposit much of the world’s electronic telecommunications in US government databases. Nominally targeting non-US citizens, the system pulls data from hundreds of millions of people’s internet communications, many of whom, the NSA admits (pdf), are Americans.

Each program works differently, which adds to the difficulty of figuring out how many people are being caught up in the surveillance. PRISM allows the NSA to retrieve data directly from U.S. companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft through negotiated data-sharing contracts. Security analyst Ashkan Soltani mapped out how the system might work based on available information. The NSA sends a request for data, employees pull target emails, text and video chats, photographs, and other data, and then pass it along to the NSA for analysis. “Upstream” is a program that taps even more data by intercepting undersea fiber-optic cables that carry “about 80%” of the world’s traffic. This allows the US government to eavesdrop on foreign communications over U.S. networks and detect suspicious patterns in the metadata.

Yet the political enthusiasm for this type of surveillance is waning. Last year, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act in a overwhelming bipartisan vote that halted the NSA’s bulk collection of phone metadata of US citizens, such as phone numbers, call length and time. The vote marked the first time Congress has restricted government surveillance since the September 11 attacks in 2001.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.