Pentagon May Be Able To Reduce Furloughs to Just Six Days

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel delivers remarks to civilian employees of the Fleet Readiness Center at NAS Jacksonville, Fla., after touring their facility on July 16.

DoD Photo By Glenn Fawcett

AA Font size + Print

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel delivers remarks to civilian employees of the Fleet Readiness Center at NAS Jacksonville, Fla., after touring their facility on July 16.

The Defense Department says it might only have to furlough its civilian workforce for six days, rather than the planned 11 days. By Defense One Staff

The Defense Department says it might only have to furlough its civilian workforce for six days, rather than the planned 11 days.

No final decision has been made, but Pentagon officials told The Associated Press that they think can come up with an additional $500 million to $900 million in savings during the final months of the fiscal year which means furloughs. If they can find $500 million, furlough days will be cut to eight days. If $900 million can be cut elsewhere, furlough days could be reduced to just six days.

About 650,000 department civilians have been taking one furlough day each week since early July. The furloughs were expected to save roughly $2 billion.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has said he’d keep looking for ways to cut the number of furlough days. Hagel has been getting an earful on furloughs as he traveled to several military installations this summer.

According to AP, “officials said the savings are the result of a number of things, including penny-pinching by the military services and Congress’ decision to give the Pentagon more flexibility in moving money around between accounts.”

Even if the savings are found, the department still faces furloughs during next fiscal year, during which $52 billion in cuts must be made, if sequestration stays in effect.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.