West Coast Missile Defense System Remains on Hold

A ground based interceptor missile launches from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., on December 5, 2008.

Navy Media Content Services by Jose Davila

AA Font size + Print

A ground based interceptor missile launches from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., on December 5, 2008.

Following a failed test last year, the Pentagon still has not convinced Congress a California- and Alaska-based defense system is ready for prime time. By Rachel Oswald

Congressional auditors say the Pentagon is not giving Congress adequate information about its plan for testing a troubled strategic missile defense system.

Information provided by the Defense Department on options for conducting additional tests of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system is not nearly comprehensive enough to give lawmakers a solid understanding of the benefits and risks of pursuing different development and testing strategies, the Government Accountability Office said in a Wednesday report.

The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system consists of 30 Ground Based Interceptors deployed at two states — California and Alaska — and a supporting network of sensors that supply information about potential ballistic missile threats. It is the country’s principal defense against a limited long-range missile attack. In response to the evolving strategic missile threat posed by North Korea, the Pentagon intends to field an additional 14 interceptors in Alaska by the end of fiscal 2017.

However, the GMD system has not had a successful intercept test since 2008. The most recent attempted intercept in summer 2013 was aimed at proving that fixes to the interceptor’s front-end Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle were working. It ended up revealing additional problems, though, with the missile’s rocket booster technology.

The Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency was ordered by Congress in the fiscal 2013 Defense Authorization Act to provide lawmakers with a report on the testing plan for the strategic antimissile system. The assessment was to highlight the “feasibility, advisability, and cost effectiveness of accelerating GMD’s testing pace,” the report states.

Congress’ internal watchdog found that the report provided by the Pentagon looked at just one testing option — redesigning and testing the divert thrusters of the kill vehicle, which help to steer the component while in flight. But even in assessing that component, the Defense Department’s report included sparse information about options related to cost and schedule.

The GAO auditors also found that due to the July 2013 intercept failure, which involved an earlier version of the kill vehicle, it would be “premature” for the Missile Defense Agency to make decisions about the schedule and nature of further testing of the EKV component until an ongoing review of the failed test is finished.

The report concluded that the Pentagon was unlikely to be able to successfully speed up the pace of testing the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system, due to its previous testing history and the increasing complexity of the next planned trials.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.