What We Talk About When We Talk About the VA

An Air Force veteran participates in the VA's 28th Annual National Veterans Golden Age Games.

Department of Veterans Affairs

AA Font size + Print

An Air Force veteran participates in the VA's 28th Annual National Veterans Golden Age Games.

We should be very careful about generalizing from a genuine problem with veterans care to a broad conclusion that VA is failing veterans across the board. By Tom Shoop

This week, Defense One co-hosted a symposium on veterans issues with Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. The timing couldn’t have been better: the day after House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Fla., reached a deal with his Senate counterpart, Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on VA reform legislation, Miller appeared at the event to make the case for a long-range effort to overhaul the Veterans Affairs Department.

Outsiders, too, showed their support for veterans. Longtime broadcast journalist Soledad O’Brien screened The War Comes Home, a documentary on vets struggling with post-tramautic stress, that is scheduled to run on CNN Aug. 12.

TV personality and actor Montel Williams, a veteran himself, gave a mesmerizing address at which he drew an enthusiastic reaction both from attendees and an even larger audience on Twitter to his attacks on congressional inaction and indignation that VA employees would continue to be eligible to receive bonuses under the reform legislation.

Watch Williams’ remarks:

As I sat watching the event, I tweeted about Williams impassioned call for a “surge” in federal efforts to provide care for veterans. It quickly drew dozens of retweets:

Minutes later, I tweeted Williams’s remarks in support of the VA, in which he noted that  that the vast majority of what the department does for veterans is “amazing”:

That drew a grand total of two retweets, one of them from a Defense One colleague of mine.

Right now, nobody wants to hear about the good that VA is doing. That’s understandable in the midst of a scandal. But we should be very careful about generalizing from a genuine problem with veterans care and patient scheduling to a broad conclusion that VA is failing veterans across the board.

Likewise, we should be very careful about rushing to limit bonuses and make it easier to fire VA executives. Such actions have long-term consequences. Streamlining the firing process, for example, may serve to increase accountability, but it also runs the risk of politicizing an agency that should be insulated from partisan pressure to the maximum extent possible.

VA reform is vital. But it will take a long-term, sustained effort. Rushing into changes in the name of taking immediate action could create unintended consequences. If we demonize the people who work at VA (many of whom are veterans themselves), it won’t have much effect on the bad ones. But the good ones will get demoralized and leave.

VA is a big bureaucracy. That means it tends to come up with big bureaucratic solutions to problems. So a lot of fresh thinking may be required to implement innovations that will improve service to veterans for years to come. In the meantime, we should be careful about making big changes in the name of taking swift action that we’ll regret later.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download
  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

    Download
  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.