Is The Government Getting Stingier With Cyber Threat Data?

Virginia Tech War Memorial

Virginia Tech's network security chief thinks so. He says overclassification is making it harder to prep and respond.

The top cybersecurity official at one of the country’s foremost scientific institutions says the federal government is too secretive about the threat tips it shares.

Virginia Tech is no stranger to hackers. Randy Marchany, the school’s chief information security officer, says he assumes the attackers are already inside the networks. The university’s attack space includes power generation networks, campus police databases, research files, student records and retail payment systems, among other sensitive digital operations, he said.

I’m not the CISO of a university; I’m the CISO of a small town,” said the nearly 40-year information security veteran at a cybersecurity conference Tuesday. 

Marchany lamented what he says has been a growing trend during the last couple of years of the government restricting information about ongoing hack campaigns — information that could help his staff identify the suspicious activity they already glimpse on systems.

The federal government now has this tendency to try to put a classified label on everything, and so I have to sometimes go to a dark room and have people hand me information” that I can only look at, he said. 

Marchany said, at one meeting, he said aloud a list of malicious IP addresses traced back to China. His colleague motioned him to stop talking by drawing a hand across his neck in a throat-cutting gesture, Marchany said. 

Throwing a wide-open net over everything, in a way, hinders my ability to a) get the information from you and b) to be able to disseminate that to my peers in the education world,” he said. 

Having said that, the information that we do get turns out to be really, really valuable in helping us correlate something” unusual witnessed on a network, because “usually, we see it before you do,” Marchany told the audience of 162 mostly government and contractor employees at the summit, which was hosted by the Association for Federal Information Resources Management and U.S. Cyber Challenge. “We’re the real world.”

According to the Obama administration, the government’s Cyber Information Sharing and Collaboration Program has provided 28,000 indicators of malicious activity to the private sector since 2011. In 2014, Roberta Stempfley, then-Department of Homeland Security acting assistant secretary of cybersecurity and communications, said the indicators are “generally” unclassified

From 2006 to 2013, 550 universities reported some kind of data breach, NBC News reported last September.

Virginia Tech suffered a data breach in August 2013, when an intruder hacked a human resources computer server containing sensitive data on 145,000 job applicants, along with license plate numbers for 16,600 of those individuals. The forms that were compromised asked applicants to indicate their professional licenses and certificates.

Have we been breached? Yes, we’ve been breached,” Marchany acknowledged. 

Today, reports of a new data breach at a university somewhere in the world are published almost weekly.

In late February, the University of California, Berkeley, announced a hack into a school financial system that compromised the Social Security or bank account numbers of about 80,000 students, alumni and vendors. 

For more than two years, suspected Chinese and other nation-state hackers nestled inside computers at Penn State’s engineering school, which happens to develop sensitive technology for the Navy, Bloomberg reported in May 2015. 

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.