Why Aircraft Carrier Workers Deserve a Better Plan from the Pentagon

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Ricardo R. Guzman

AA Font size + Print

Predictable and stable work is what the aircraft carrier industrial base needs. By Rick Giannini and Darrell Grow

The uncertain future Pentagon officials have charted for the Navy’s aircraft carrier fleet unfortunately provides no clear direction for the defense industrial base that builds and supplies it. The Defense Department’s decision to tie carriers, including the fate of the USS George Washington, to future budgets leaves them questioning how they should proceed to prepare inventory, allocate resources and hire skilled workers for new construction and maintenance of aircraft carriers — all actions that must occur well in advance of the actual start of work.

Manufacturers are facing long-term effects from delays and ambiguity in construction plans for new aircraft carriers, and the maintenance of existing ones, which increases the cost and viability of the carrier program. These delays disrupt plans and the allocation of resources for thousands of large and small businesses, threatening an already-fragile industrial base.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said last month that DOD next year may pull the USS George Washington from service if sequestration budget restraints continue. Inactivating that ship and cancelling its scheduled 44-month maintenance and modernization period eliminates a carrier halfway through its 50-year service life, denying a significant capability to the nation.

As businessmen, we find it hard to understand why our country would give up 10 percent of our aircraft carrier force in an effort to save less than 1 percent of the defense budget. We also do not understand why the nation would put more than 600 companies in 39 states that will provide parts and services for the USS George Washington’s overhaul at risk by eliminating planned work and expected revenue.

The United States’ ability to maintain a powerful fleet of aircraft carriers to respond in times of crisis depends on a robust, skilled industrial base with the capacity to build and maintain these complex ships. Suppliers hire and train skilled craftsmen, make investments in capital, technology and inventory, and build detailed business plans based on long-range construction and maintenance schedules. Like a carrier’s crew, a skilled labor force requires continuous training to maintain technological superiority, efficiency and effectiveness. Take one example of the significant investments that suppliers must make in highly-trained computer numerical control, or CNC operators. These skilled workers are employed in manufacturing facilities to operate high-capital machines to accurately and efficiently produce specialized, precision metal parts for aircraft carriers. Without aircraft carrier work, companies will have no incentive to make the significant investment in these workers, their unique skills or the specialized equipment that they operate. This critical industrial-base skill will be lost, and if work resumes, delays and increased costs will result as companies attempt to find, rehire or retrain new workers.

As we have seen in many other countries, when uncertainty creeps into shipbuilding, companies leave the industrial base, and irreplaceable technologies and skills critical to shipbuilding are lost. As former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned last year, “The last damn thing we need if we face a crisis is to somehow contract out that responsibility to another country. So we have to maintain the core industrial base that we need. The skills are essential to our ability to maintain a strong national defense.”

(Read more Defense One coverage of the Navy here)

USS Enterprise was kept combat-ready for more than 50 years, from its first deployment during the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 until its final deployment in support of operations in Afghanistan in 2012, by the products and services produced by unique and vital industrial bases. As new technologies were developed to upgrade existing ships and build the most advanced Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers, more than 2,000 small, midsized and large businesses from 43 states invested to develop new products and learn new skills.

Building new carriers every five years and undertaking maintenance on a regular schedule preserves the fleet at its required operational level of 11 carriers and keeps the industrial base viable and strong. It also ensures that the industrial base can continue to guarantee that the U.S. Navy and taxpayers receive the best return on their 50-year investment in these powerful ships, from construction to maintenance to modernization.

Former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, last year, said, “[W]herever you live across the country, Americans benefit from opportunities generated by the shipbuilding and repair industry.” We must make it a priority to invest in the construction of the next-generation Gerald R. Ford-class of carriers and continued regular maintenance of Nimitz-class carriers like the USS George Washington. Predictable and stable work for the aircraft carrier industrial base will ensure that it remains a viable force for the future and sustain its capability to keep the Navy strong and aircraft carriers ready to respond anywhere in the world during times of crisis.

Rick Giannini is president and CEO of Milwaukee Valve Company. He serves as chairman of the Aircraft Carrier Industrial Base Coalition, or ACIBC. Darrell Grow is chief operating officer of AMMCON and serves as the coalition’s vice chairman. 

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.