Eliminating Double Standards in the Marine Corps

The first three female graduates from the School of Infantry East Infantry Training Battalion course standing during a ceremony

U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Justin A. Rodriguez

AA Font size + Print

The first three female graduates from the School of Infantry East Infantry Training Battalion course standing during a ceremony

Gen. Amos was right to change the policy prohibiting women from taking the Infantry Officer Course twice. By Rep. Duncan Hunter

In a recent Washington Post op-ed, a female Marine officer issued a strong complaint that women, unlike their male counterparts, are unfairly denied a second opportunity to pass the prestigious and arduous Marine Corps Infantry Officers Course (IOC). 

In the op-ed, the officer explained: “The Marine leadership has said it doesn’t want female lieutenants taking the course multiple times, at least until combat positions are available to women, because it doesn’t want to delay the rest of their training. Yet many of the men who failed alongside me in January are back at Quantico, training to retake the course in April.”

It is valid criticism, given the Marine Corps’ data-driven evaluation of opening combat specialties to women. One thing that has always set Marines apart is their nondescript nature.  They are committed to each other, as members of the same battle-tested organization, as much as they are committed to mission success. 

The female officer was right to call attention to a double standard in the treatment of officers.  Through it all, beginning with the grueling first days of training, the objective for the Marine Corps is to maximize combat effectiveness.  No matter the circumstance, that cannot change and the Marine Corps must resist every urge to dilute its standards.  After all, it’s these high and uncompromising standards that have made the Marine Corps so effective.

As the saying goes, there is “no better friend, no worse enemy.”  That is true of all Marines in service to their country. 

Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos was right to respond as he did, by issuing a change in the rule.  The female Marine was also offered and accepted orders to join the Marine Expeditionary Brigade Forward in Afghanistan.  It’s a unique experience and a challenging environment for any Marine. 

Gen. Amos’ decision should not be viewed as the Marine Corps in some way making an exception or providing special treatment where there should be none. Rather, the rule change is significant on the grounds that the Marine Corps remains committed thus far to preserving the highest standards and ensuring any eligible Marine who is willing and capable has the same opportunity to pass the elite officers course.     

The same must be true for how the Marine Corps proceeds in evaluating ground combat specialties and physical test standards for occupations specifically.  There should be no distinctions for standards and test requirements beyond general fitness targets that every Marine must reach.  That is something that Gen. Amos and the rest of the Marine Corp leadership understands.  

One report indicated that Gen. Amos “bristled at the headline” of the Post op-ed, which stated that female officers have “failed” the IOC.   His response was justified.  The standards are firm and uncompromising.  All Marines must meet those standards.  They are not arbitrary nor do they allow for selectivity.

IOC is a benchmark that gauges and accentuates the leadership, mental fortitude and physical stamina of Marine Corps infantry officers.  Those who accomplish the course are leaders among Marines for good reason.

Credit is due all around in the case.  The issue of opening combat specialties will continue to be evaluated but every Marine should have the same opportunity to at least complete a course based on their abilities and qualifications. 

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.