U.S.-Russian Cultural Relations Are on Ice, Too

Sailors from the U.S., Russia, France and the United Kingdom at a wreath laying ceremony during the 2012 FRUKUS Exercise

.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Stephen Oleksiak

AA Font size + Print

Sailors from the U.S., Russia, France and the United Kingdom at a wreath laying ceremony during the 2012 FRUKUS Exercise

The Russians may be coming -- but not in the way any of us had hoped. By Tara Sonenshine

It’s called FRUKUS, an acronym that only the military could come up with. It is an annual multinational training exercise at sea involving the France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Until now.

FRUKUS was created in 2003 as part of the growing military-military relationship between Russia and the West. As recently as last summer, the four nations were doing joint sea exercises like boarding drills, damage control training, and in-port games including sporting events and cultural activities. “The partnerships, cooperation, and friendships forged during this exercise are critical to the promotion of peace in the region,” says a July 2013 press release by the U.S. Navy.

How quickly things change. Today, against the backdrop of Vice President Joe Biden’s trip to Kiev to announce more support for Ukrainians and harsher sanctions against Russia, the once-promising U.S.-Russia military-to-military relationship has entered rough seas.

Mil-to-mil relations, as they are called, are important elements of any bilateral relationship. For the past decade, American and Russian defense experts have expanded ties, including maritime security and humanitarian responses to natural disasters. In 2012 the first contingent of Russian soldiers visited Fort Carson, Colo., to jump with U.S. soldiers out of parachutes, and practice firing weapons and responding to military medical emergencies.

The Pentagon is now halting all military engagement with Russia, which means military meetings, port visits and join exercises are replaced by tit-for-tat blames games and finger pointing.  Lost in the fog of friction will be all those pictures of U.S. troops training with Russians and memories of days when American taxpayers footed the bill for U.S. aid to pre-Putin’s Soviet Union. (It is worth recalling that in the period between 1941 and 1945 the U.S. sent $11.3 billion worth of war supplies to the Soviet people under the Lend-Lease Act. And for 20 years, until the closure of USAID’s Moscow office in 2012, America provided $2.7 billion for civil society building and health care.)

Defense relationships often have a cultural component and that, too, has begun to wane as the Ukrainian crisis heats up with more violence on the ground. A small but symbolic sign of cultural coldness is the decision to scrap a U.S.-Russian theatrical event, aptly named, “The Russians Are Coming! A Festival of Radical New Theater from Moscow.” The major festival of contemporary Russian arts, with as many as 90 Russian actors and directors, was due to take place in Washington’s Woolly Mammoth Theater in October.

The Russians may be coming — but not in the way any of us had hoped.

Bridges were built and joint programs planned and implemented. Those of us who have worked in government know how relationships take years to create and days to crack. There will be enormous work to steady the ships in both countries in what one hopes will be calmer waters ahead. Yes, we have to deal with the immediate crisis and use sanctions and diplomatic pressure to support Ukraine and to deter further Russian moves. At the same time, we can’t lose sight of what was once accomplished and now stands to be lost on both defense and culture as would-be partners now practice against each other, not with each other.

Tara D. Sonenshine is former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs and a Distinguished Fellow at George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.