Congress Will Rethink Combatant Command Boundaries

A U.S. sailor reviews a map aboard the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71), July 28, 2012.

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Christopher S. Johnson

AA Font size + Print

A U.S. sailor reviews a map aboard the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71), July 28, 2012.

Reshaping, or even deleting, some of the four-star headquarters that run America’s military operations around the world could be part of broader Defense Department reforms.

Congress may reshape — or even close — some of the Pentagon’s combatant commands, the four-star headquarters that oversee military activities in all corners of the world, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman said Thursday.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said his panel would look at combatant command responsibilities when it considers broader Defense Department reforms this year.

“We need to figure out whether we need the ones that we have,” McCain said at a Defense Writers Group breakfast.

The boundaries of what the military calls “COCOMs” are laid out in a document called the Unified Command Plan. Every few years, defense leaders debate redrawing the boundaries or combining commands, but there haven’t been any major changes since U.S. Africa Command was created in 2006.

Is it right for us to have an Africa [Command] headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany? Is that what we had in mind when we formed up AFRICOM?
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

In 2012 and 2013, Pentagon leaders considered combining U.S. Northern Command, which oversees homeland defense of the continental United States, Canada and Mexico, with Southern Command, which oversees Central and South America. And in December, incoming Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford said he’d be open to changes.

McCain on Tuesday hinted that lawmakers would consider combining those two commands.

“We need to look at small things, such as ‘Do we need a NORTHCOM and a SOUTHCOM?,” he said. “Why should there be an arbitrary line at the Mexico-Guatemala border?”

As well, the structure of Africa Command, which is headquartered in Europe, has been debated since its creation.

“Is it right for us to have an Africa [Command] headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany?,” McCain said. “Is that what we had in mind when we formed up AFRICOM?”

Some have argued that Northern Command should oversee all military action in the Arctic, where nations are jockeying for natural resources. NORTHCOM currently splits the responsibility with European Command.

Defense Department map, labeled, “The World With Commanders’ Areas of Responsibility.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.