More Americans Are Questioning Why We Went to Afghanistan in the First Place

Department of Defense

AA Font size + Print

A new poll shows an overwhelming majority of Americans are tired of the war in Afghanistan. By Matt Vasilogambros

Twelve years of war is a long time—not just for the troops fighting, but also for the American public watching the final stages of the U.S. drawdown. And it looks as if this war fatigue is translating in the polls.

Americans are now questioning the very motivation for going to war in the first place.

Now, only 28 percent of Americans think the war in Afghanistan has been worth fighting, according to an ABC News/Washinton Post poll released on Friday. Following the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, Americans, by and large, were united in wanting to track down the people responsible (as high as 90 percent in 2002). But after 2,000 deaths in America’s longest war, 67 percent of Americans don’t think it was worth it.

This poll, conducted July 18-21, represents an 11-point drop since March. During that time, countless headlines about Afghanistan have been marked with the unmistakable tension between the U.S. and Afghan governments.

The sentiments of the American public are also apparent in responses to a question asking whether U.S. fighting in Afghanistan has contributed to the long-term security of the United States; 50 percent of Americans don’t think it has. Only 17 percent think it’s contributed a great deal, while another 26 percent think it has helped somewhat.

The U.S. has tried to find some semblance of a victory in this conflict, ramping up troop levels after President Obama came into office. But with the increase in drone attacks and pressure from the Afghan government, the U.S. is following through with what the American people have wanted for some time: a steady drawdown of troops, which is scheduled to be complete in 2014.

Now, military leaders and officials within the Obama administration are debating whether to leave a small number of military personnel on the ground to continue helping with training Afghan security forces and providing other logistical assistance with counterterrorism missions. However, in recent months, some officials have floated the “zero option,” which would withdraw all U.S. personnel from Afghanistan in the coming months.

It’s unclear what decision the president will make, but 53 percent of the 1,002 adults polled think the U.S. should remove most, not all, forces from Afghanistan. Forty-three percent think the U.S. should remove all forces from the ground. Just 1 percent of Americans think the U.S. should continue current troop levels, a number well within the margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

And this widespread drop of approval for the war in Afghanistan crossed party lines, as well as race and gender. Obama’s approval rating on foreign policy may be down in recent weeks, but Americans agree with him on one thing: getting out of Afghanistan.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download
  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

    Download
  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.