Pentagon Waits Out Shutdown While Sequestration Looms

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel talks to his top leaders during his trip to South Korea.

DoD Photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo

AA Font size + Print

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel talks to his top leaders during his trip to South Korea.

As the Pentagon waits for an end to the government shutdown, it’s getting ready for the next battle: sequestration. By Stephanie Gaskell

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is traveling in Asia, far from the dysfunction of Washington where Congress has once again hijacked his ability to plan his budget. First there was sequestration, now there’s a government shutdown and, in a matter of months, another fight over sequestration and this year’s budget.

“The Pentagon … has no budget. We are still living under this dark cloud of uncertainty not knowing what’s going to happen. This reflects on our missions around the world. It reflects our allies’ questioning our commitments. It affects our planning as we are in the process, as you know, of preparing a 2015 budget as we are preparing for further significant cuts under the current law, Budget Control Act 2011, which means $52 billion in additional cuts,” Hagel said during a stop in Seoul, South Korea.

Hagel has been talking to Deputy Secretary Ash Carter, Comptroller Bob Hale and acting General Counsel Bob Taylor to find a way to mitigate the pain of the shutdown, namely how to exempt more civilian workers from furloughs. He said national security is not at risk, but “when you take that number of civilian employees out of the mix of every day planning and working — and they all work with these kinds of things — you’re going to impact readiness. You’re going to impact a mission. There’s no point in kidding about that.”

Pentagon leaders are struggling to match their strategic goals — winding down the war in Afghanistan, rebalancing to Asia while keeping an eye on the Middle East, becoming a leaner military – without knowing what budget conditions they’re operating under.

[Read Defense One’s complete coverage of the government shutdown here]

“It would be nice to say we do a strategy and then we derive a budget. And in good times, in normal times, we’re a lot closer to that,” Hale said in a recent interview with Defense One. “So I think it would be disingenuous to say that we aren’t — there are budget-driven decisions that are happening right now. We are trying to keep in mind the strategy in every way that we can, but we have meet some of the legally binding budget targets.”

Hagel, a former senator who joined Congress in 1997 just after the last government shutdown, said he’s frustrated by the gridlock in Congress.

“I do worry,” he said, “about the essence of governing in a democracy and that we’ve seemed to lose, and that is consensus and compromise. No democracy can govern itself without consensus and compromise. It is impossible. And we seem to have lost that. We have seemed to have lost our way in that being an objective of governing.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.