Doubts Linger Over Syrian Weapons Disclosure

Susan Walsh/AP

AA Font size + Print

After U.N. certification, U.S. officials still unsure of the actual number of Syria's weapons making sites or their facilities. By Global Security Newswire

U.S. officials are continuing to question whether the embattled Syrian government truly dismantled all of its chemical-weapons equipment under the direction of international monitors in the civil war-torn nation, according to reports.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons announced on Thursday that Syria completed the functional destruction of critical equipment from its 23 declared chemical-weapons production and mixing sites, and an OPCW-U.N. team was done with inspections in the Mideast country.

However, U.S. officials previously estimated the Syrian government had 45 chemical-arms sites, and still are not sure if that jibes with Assad’s declaration that the country has just 23 sites with 41 facilities. In addition, OPCW-U.N. inspectors could not visit two of the 23 Syrian sites because of security concerns, so international observers have to trust the Assad regime’s assurance that the locations are abandoned and their equipment was moved.

Our assessment is it is unlikely Syria will declare and/or destroy all of their chemical weapons,” an unnamed senior official with access to current intelligence told CNN on Thursday.

Syrian President Bashar Assad in September agreed to accept the destruction of his chemical-weapons arsenal amid international condemnation following an August gas-attack on citizens. The chemical watchdog agency is working to eliminate the chemical arsenal in Syria by mid-2014, starting with equipment.

Some clarity may be coming on the not-visited sites. Reports out of Syria on Friday say the army captured from rebel control a northern town containing one of them, Reuters reported.

In Washington on Thursday, a key senator questioned the discrepancy between Assad’s disclosure of 23 chemical-arms sites and 41 facilities compared to the U.S. estimate of 45 sites.

What’s the story with what we believe are the rest of the sites, and how are we ensuring that we are getting access to the entire inventory of what we believe exists in Syria?” Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) asked during a hearing on Syria.

Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation Thomas Countryman replied: “Whether we are talking about sites and facilities, whether we are double-counting, it is — as you note — a serious question that needs to be addressed.”

He said the State Department is “carefully” studying Syria’s classified 700-page inventory of its holdings.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.