U.S., Afghanistan Negotiators Reach a Deal on Post-2014 Security Agreement

The U.S. and Afghanistan have agreed on a deal to keep coalition troops past 2014. Now comes the hard part -- a group of Afghan elders must approve it. By Defense One Staff

U.S. and Afghan negotiators have approved a final draft of a security agreement that would allow a small contingent of U.S. and NATO troops to remain after the 2014 withdrawal. Now a group of several thousand Afghan elders must approve it.

The bilateral security agreement will remain in effect through the end of 2024 and possibly longer, if renewed, according to a “pre-decisional document” posted on the Afghan Foreign Ministry website. According to the draft, the United States would not operate any military bases in the country, but would be allowed access to “agreed facilities and areas,” along with locations where the U.S. military has exclusive access.

The draft agreement will now be debated at Thursday’s Loya Jirga, a gathering of Afghan elders. The agreement, the Associated Press first reported on Wednesday, would allow the U.S. to conduct counter-terrorism operations against the small number of al-Qaeda members still in Afghanistan and help Afghan forces stave off the Taliban.

“The parties acknowledge that U.S. military operations to defeat al-Qaeda and its affiliates may be appropriate in the common fight against terrorism,” the draft agreement says. “The parties agree to continue their close cooperation and coordination toward those ends, with the intention of protecting U.S. and Afghan national interests without unilateral U.S. military counter-terrorism operations.”

The agreement also gives U.S. troops immunity from prosecution by Afghanistan — the key sticking point that led to a failure to keep U.S. troops in Iraq after the war ended in 2011. The Loya Jirga will meet for several days before making a decision. 

Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s spokesman, Aimal Faizai, told The New York Times that a deal would be contingent on a letter of apology from President Obama for mistakes made by the U.S. military in the course of the war. The newspaper later reported that Secretary of State John Kerry said Karzai did not ask for an apology letter from the president.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.