Republicans Want to Mandate a Vote on the Iran Nuclear Deal

Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., speak to reporters during a press conference on Thursday.

AP Photo

AA Font size + Print

Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., speak to reporters during a press conference on Thursday.

A group of senators said late Wednesday that sanctions would be automatically reimposed if the White House does not consult Congress. By Clara Ritger

A group of Republican senators wants to require President Obama to come to Congress for approval on any nuclear deal with Iran.

Sens. Bob Corker of Tennessee, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain of Arizona, and James Risch of Idaho announced late Wednesday a plan to mandate that the president submit a deal to Congress for consideration within three days of concluding an agreement with Iran.

Corker, the primary sponsor of the bill, said coming to Congress is in the president’s interest, because it will help garner the support of the American people for a final deal.

Hopefully, this will become something that is very bipartisan,” Corker said. “This bill is about transparency.”

According to the senators’ Iran Nuclear Negotiations Act, if the president does not submit a deal to Congress, sanctions will be automatically reimposed.

The bill would also automatically reimpose sanctions on Iran on Nov. 28 should a deal not be reached by the Nov. 24 deadline announced last week by the P5+1.

Additionally, the bill requires that Congress be informed within 10 days if the administration finds that the Iranians violated the deal or failed to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which conducts inspections of nuclear facilities. If the Iranians do not hold up their end of the deal, the senators said, the sanctions would be automatically reimposed.

Rubio said he supported legislating stricter punishment for Iran if it does not uphold the bargain because he is skeptical that it will.

They want relief from as many sanctions as possible without agreeing to any sanctions on their nuclear program,” Rubio said. “I know that so many other issues are going on around the world, but what should not be lost in all of this is the ambitions of a rogue nation to acquire a nuclear weapon and establish dominance in the region.”

Graham said because Congress imposed the sanctions, it should have a say in whether the deal is strong enough to lift them.

President Obama felt he needed congressional approval to move forward in Syria, and Congress should insist on being involved in any nuclear deal with Iran,” Graham said. “I cannot think of anything more serious we would vote on other than going to war.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.