The Anti-Snowden? Ex-SEAL’s Firm Caught Between Security and Privacy

alphaspirit via Shutterstock

AA Font size + Print

Former Navy commando Mike Janke is a spy-turned-privacy advocate, but don’t compare him to NSA leaker Edward Snowden. By Aliya Sternstein

Another Pentagon covert operative has left his post at the Defense Department to join the fight for civil liberties. But you probably won’t find him buddying up with ex-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden any time soon. 

Former Navy SEAL commando Mike Janke is a spy-turned-privacy advocate. Unlike Snowden, he still has friendly relations with U.S. special operations teams, as the co-founder of a company that encrypts communications for feds and activists alike. 

Still, his allegiances are split right now. 

The federal government uses his firm, Silent Circle, to hide sensitive information from the public. The public uses its secure email, texts, videos and calls to hide personal information. And the private sector uses its technology to hide trade secrets from foreign governments and the public. As a citizen, father and intellectual property owner, Janke has had all those needs himself. 

“The FBI is a customer of ours,” he says. At the same time, “they wanted legislation to put a back door into all kinds of technologies like Silent Circle” for intercepting transmissions, “so, we’re torn.”

Late Thursday, company executives said they felt compelled to cut off Silent Mail, the email service, to preempt any government attempt at email-tapping. The move came after the shutdown earlier in the day of another email provider, Lavabit, that Snowden reportedly relied on for secure correspondences. 

Silent Circle might lose some customers in the short term, but the popularity of anti-snooping software is only growing in the wake of the Snowden case. According to Forbes, monthly revenue for Silent Circle jumped more than 400 percent month-on-month after the media’s June 6 revelations about NSA Internet surveillance. And Janke’s firm will continue to offer its other popular services, which don’t collect metadata about conversations and prohibit the company from deciphering content.

Janke claims that about one percent of his user base abuses the services to conceal illicit activities. But U.S. authorities won’t put Silent Circle out of business, Janke says, because those tools alone cannot erase every digital footprint. 

Criminals and bad people aren’t that smart. They have Twitter accounts. They post on Facebook. They use their credit cards that are stolen,” he says. “Law enforcement and government today have so many other avenues, electronically, at their disposal to say, ‘Oh, we found the bad person. Oh, they’re using Silent Circle. So what? We can see them communicating on Gmail.’”

In May, Silent Circle united with civil libertarians and cryptographers to protest the FBI proposal that would force all web services to plant bugs into real-time communications, like the eavesdropping features embedded in traditional telecommunications.

That doesn’t mean Janke’s not a champion of U.S. counterintelligence operations, especially those that disrupt terrorist plots. In the activist community, there are “the fringe groups that say, ‘Why are you selling to military?’ I say, ‘Well, you don’t understand — we’re saving lives,” he explains. ”Everybody wants us to join their cause. We try to say, ‘Look, we are for everybody.”  

The need for more privacy is a response to the digitization of our lives, Janke asserts.

“I don’t use Google. I don’t let my daughter do iCloud or Instagram. I don’t let her use a regular browser,” he says, referring to Google, Apple and Facebook web services that share certain user data with third parties. “The Moore’s law of data collection,” Janke says, means that “in ten years they’ll be able to get with a single search — a medical company — your children’s medical reports [going back to] kindergarten and that follows you into jobs and into your healthcare costs.”

While Silent Circle was terminating email services last week, President Obama met with industry leaders at the White House to address electronic monitoring issues. And the next day, he extended the olive branch even further, directing administration officials and lawmakers to rethink post-9/11 surveillance laws.

“If you are outside of the intelligence community, if you are the ordinary person and you start seeing a bunch of headlines saying, ‘U.S., Big Brother looking down on you, collecting telephone records, et cetera,’ well, understandably, people would be concerned,” Obama said during a Friday afternoon press conference. In light of the questions raised, he said, “it makes sense to  have a discussion with Congress, have a discussion with industry — which is also impacted by this — have a discussion with civil libertarians, and see can we do this better.”

Janke, a former SEAL, says he understands the government’s right to secrecy and the people’s right to privacy.

“I don’t believe that there needs to be any friction between the need for a private individual, a need for a company, a need for the government. Where that friction comes in is when one’s duty, which is the government’s, frictions against the private individuals,” he says.

(Image by alphaspirit via Shutterstock)

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.