Pentagon: State Doesn’t Have Enough People Tweeting At ISIS

aiza Ali, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) community affairs director, watches U.S. President Barack Obama's speech from Cairo projected on a big screen off a laptop computer with New York area Muslim leaders at the InterChurch Center in New Y


AA Font size + Print

aiza Ali, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) community affairs director, watches U.S. President Barack Obama's speech from Cairo projected on a big screen off a laptop computer with New York area Muslim leaders at the InterChurch Center in New Y

In the war of online influence, the U.S. is gaining ground but is still hopelessly outmanned.

To change the minds of more than 16 million Muslims who could support the Islamic State, almost entirely via social media, the U.S. State Department has a counter propaganda team of just about 20 people, according to a senior Pentagon official. Translation: the U.S. is not doing enough to out-tweet ISIS.

Michael Lumpkin, assistant secretary of defense for special operations/low-intensity conflict, said the Defense Department provides 25 percent of them at State’s Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, or CSCC that focuses on counter extremist rhetoric all over the world (an outfit of about 66 people). “In the CSCC, there’s 20 some odd people who are working that particular mission set and we’re providing about 25 percent of them, detailed at the Department of State to assist with that mission … The fact that we have 25 percent of the CSCC detail to fill critical positions over there tells me that they don’t have the manpower to put against the mission like they would,” he told Congress on Thursday. The State Department confirmed that the number of Defense Department employees working the CSCC detail was 5.

Today, the State Department effort to erode the influence of ISIS on the social web, the Think Again Turn Away campaign, has received mixed reviews at best. While the Defense Department may be playing a support role to State, it has it’s own social media mission when it comes to ISIS. That includes using intelligence gleaned from social media on a tactical level, and knowing who to hit and when. “Everyone of our operations has the information operation component to it,” he said. To see what that looks like, turn to an event during the summer when the U.S. Air Combat Command was able to select and strike a target based on a single piece of information posted to social media. The strike took less than 24 hours.

Lumpkin did say that counterterrorism influence operations are growing smarter. The joint agency effort is reaching out to commercial partners that have actual social media chops.  Using private firms to conduct social media marketing on behalf of the U.S. has been a major source of criticism. They’re also taking a slightly more nuanced and personal approach and attempting to tailor messages to be more individual. He cited a recent white paper by Lebanon-based marketing group called Quantum, which categorizes ISIS supporters and members into nine different types. That more detailed categorization “allows for better targeting,” he said, in a hearing before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities.

So who are the ISIS supporters you’ll meet online? The types are: the status seeker, the identity seeker, revenge seeker, redemption seeker, responsibility seeker, thrill seeker, the ideologically driven supporter, the justice driven supporter, and death seeker.

“As things are developed, just as our enemies target specific audiences, we … have to have unique messages directed to these nine different bins.”

It sounds not unlike the way the Obama administration used analytics to push voter turnout during the 2012 election. Chicago-based Civis Analytics separated potential voters into bins not on the basis of age, income, or other demographic fields but rather on the basis of willingness to engage with the campaign by volunteering, raising money, or simply opening emails the millions upon millions of emails that the campaign was sending all the time.

Rep. Trent Franks, R-AZ, pointed out the obvious challenge in attempting to appeal to the same crowd that ‘likes’ violent decapitation videos. “It sounds like that last guy is going to be a little bit recalcitrant, the death seeker.” And there are millions of them.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.