If We Were Really Going to Invade Iran, We Would Have Used This

The Button 5.60 from General Dynamics Electric Boat.

U.S. Special Operations Command

AA Font size + Print

The Button 5.60 from General Dynamics Electric Boat.

The future of covert sea operations looks nothing like what just happened in Iran.

Yesterday, ten American sailors were detained by Iran after their boat came too close to Iranian territory. The Iranians wasted no time accusing the sailors of spying (before letting them go.) But if the U.S. military were going to send a small team into Iran on a covert mission, would they really use a patrol boat? Probably not.

In the future, the vehicle for that mission will look something like this: a claustrophobic torpedo-like, 30-foot mini-submarine capable of putting six to ten Navy SEALs on enemy shores.

Currently, U.S. Special Operations Command, or SOCOM, is testing a couple of different versions of a mini submarine for commandos: the 31-foot “Button” 5.60 by General Dynamics and Giunio Santi Engineering of Italy and the S351 by Submergence Group out of Connecticut and Britain’s MSUBS. (In  October of last year, they successfully completed testing on a 23-foot test sub called the S301i by Lockheed Martin.) They’re piloted by humans and directed by sonar. The Button has a speed of 60 nautical miles at 5 knots. The picture above is of the technology demonstrator for the “Button.” The sub that the military ultimately deploys may look a bit different.

It’s not the first time that the Pentagon has experimented with mini-submarines for covert operators. In 1994, the military launched a program called to build six 65-foot submarines and two storage facilities at a projected cost of $524 million, with the first sub to be delivered in 1997. By 2003, the cost had grown to $2 billion before even one sub was delivered, according to a GAO report. In 2011, the military decided again to try and make dry mini-submarines, resulting in the current program.

The “Button” may seem unbearably uncomfortable but it presents an improvement over the Proteus, which is what’s called a “wet submersible.” It’s basically a submarine that isn’t sealed; the operators are submerged in water while they use it. Think of a dark, flooded coffin.

The water both inside and outside of the sub is sometimes very cold and the entire experience can wear on a SEAL, making it difficult to jump out in the dead of night and raid terrorist compounds.

“Sometimes with what we do, what we develop, it seems like the mission is to get someone from point A to point B when the real mission is to get someone from point A to point B to enable them to get to point C, D, E, and F and then back to point A,” Capt. Keith Lehnhardt, program executive officer for the dry submarine program, told Defense One last May. “The mission really starts when the SEALS get to the end, when there’s potentially bad guys shooting at them. Our job is to get them there as fresh as possible. If you’re sitting in the water column, just imagine that you’re sitting in cold water for hours breathing off a re-breather, not being able to talk to people next to you to precisely plan what’s next. Compare that to a dry environment where you can be comfortable, talk to each-other, do some last minute things that are necessary to the mission.”

So that’s what a covert SEAL mission looks like, not ten sailors lost on a patrol boat.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.