Behind the Air Force’s Fast-Growing Cyber Research Budget

A U.S. Air Force cyber-transport technician checks network routers at the Defense Media Activity’s Headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., July 18, 2012.

Air Force photo by Val Gempis

AA Font size + Print

A U.S. Air Force cyber-transport technician checks network routers at the Defense Media Activity’s Headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., July 18, 2012.

The service wants to quadruple its money for defending networked aircraft, launch systems, satellites and a whole lot more.

It’s an annual puzzle for the Defense Department, congressional appropriators, defense contractors and hackers: Calculating how much money the armed forces should spend on protecting weapons systems and warfighting documents, along with attacking adversary networks, can be like taking a shot in the dark.

Consider, for example, the Air Force fiscal 2017 cyber budget for research, development, testing, and evaluation released earlier this month.

The branch wants to nearly quadruple the current $7.7 million purse for defending networked aircraft, launch systems, satellites and data—requesting $29.4 million next year. In the request, the Air Force has proposed doubling down on funding to disrupt foreign systems, asking for $25 million in 2017 for cyber offensives versus $12.9 million this year.

Air Force officials provided a vague rationale for the figures.

The additional funding supports the DOD and Air Force cyberspace strategic objectives of increasing cyberspace capabilities,” Air Force spokeswoman Karen Roganov told Nextgov in an email.

Keep in mind these research and development expenditures show just one portion of overall Air Force cyberspace funding, she said. The top-level line item for cyber—$4 billion—reflects measured “increases across the entire spectrum of cyberspace capabilities,” Roganov said.

See also: US Still Doesn’t Know Who’s In Charge of What If Massive Cyber Attack Strikes Nation

The inability to publicly say how these billions of cyber dollars will strengthen America’s military breeds cynicism and waste, according to some former Defense Department personnel and experts.

At some point, the questions will start coming about what it actually means to fly, fight and win in cyberspace,” Robert M. Lee, an active-duty Air Force Cyber Warfare Operations Officer who has led multiple cyberspace intelligence programs, and Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College, say in their 2014 RUSI Journal article OMG Cyber!”

The Air Force also has plans to triple spending on cyber espionage. The 2017 cyber intelligence budget requests $18.52 million, up from the 2016 level of $6.57 million. This money would benefit cyber-snooping initiatives across the Pentagon, where the proposed collective cyber budget is $7 billion, Air Force officials said.

The cyber surveillance account “includes activities in cyberspace conducted to gather intelligence that may be required to support future operations, including offensive cyber operations or defensive cyber operations,” Roganov said. These efforts focus “on tactical and operational intelligence and on mapping adversary cyberspace to support military planning.”

A problem of overpromising on cybersecurity permeates the military, the “OMG Cyber!” authors say.

Key to the effective functioning of military services is OT&E—organization, training and equipment; but the primary output has been ‘HC&C’—hype, confusion and contracts,” Lee and Rid say. “The DOD’s investment strategy leaves a bitter aftertaste for its own operators: money seems to be available in abundance for contracts, but money is tight when it comes to career and skill development.”

To its credit, the Air Force is leading the way among the services in how it produces cyber personnel, the “OMG Cyber!” writers say. The branch’s 2017 funding proposal seems to back their opinion. The billion-dollar Air Force cyber budget would rise by $200 million in 2017, in part, to train offensive and defensive cyber teams. The extra money would also fund “next-generation platforms and strike packages” for the code warriors, Roganov said.

Despite some lack of clarity around potential 2017 cybersecurity dollars, the Pentagon has come a long way over the past five years.

Back in 2011, the White House proposed spending a total of $2.3 billion on cybersecurity for the entire DOD in its 2012 budget request. However, at the time, Air Force officials announced their cybersecurity request would be $4.6 billion.

DOD officials later clarified that the Air Force’s $4.6 billion cyber figure differed from their own $440 million Air Force cyber calculation because the branch’s estimation included “things” not typically considered cybersecurity.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.