Hagel’s Korean War Lesson from a Hollow Force

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaking on Monday

Department of Defense

AA Font size + Print

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaking on Monday

On the 60th anniversary of the end of the Korean War, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is warning Washington not to hollow out the force. By Stephanie Gaskell

After a considerable downsizing of the military following World War II and the nation’s desire to “bring the boys home,” the U.S. military suffered a major defeat in the Battle of Osan, the first battle of the Korean War.  

Sixty years later on the anniversary of the end of the so-called “Forgotten War,” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, faced with steep budget cuts and the end of two major ground wars, gave a speech at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention warning Washington not to “repeat the mistakes of the past.”

“With $37 billion in mandated budget cuts that began on March 1 under sequestration, we are witnessing the largest single-year reduction in the defense budget since the drawdown after Korea,” Hagel said on Monday in Louisville, Ky. “Unless the law changes, the Department will have to absorb $52 billion in cuts next year, and a total of $500 billion in cuts over the next decade. This is in addition to the $487 billion in reductions over 10 years that we are already implementing under the Budget Control Act of 2011.” 

There’s a historic precedent to reducing the size and scope of the military after major combat, but along with that comes another historical truth: a hollow force often means major defeat in early battles of the next conflict. In Korea, Task Force Smith was defeated in part because of post-WWII cuts to the military.

This is not lost on Hagel, who fought in Vietnam. While he left the military in 1968, he watched as the Army he fought with in what was then America’s longest war become a shadow of itself in the decades that followed. At the VFW convention, Hagel told his fellow veterans to help raise awareness that budget cuts are hurting military readiness.

“You all have fought and put your lives on the line for this country,” Hagel told them. “You did so with the expectation that you would be given the equipment, training, and support you needed to succeed.  Many of you — especially those veterans of the Korean War — have seen the costs, measured in precious American lives, that come with sending a hollow force into battle.”

“We cannot repeat the mistakes of the past,” he said.

Maintaining readiness has been the department’s biggest challenge under sequestration, which is likely to roll into next fiscal year. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno has long warned of a hollow force and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told Congress this week that “we will not be able to find the money we need to achieve the level of sequestration cuts without a dramatic impact in our readiness.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.