Obama: Afghan War Will End With or Without Troop Deal

U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Eddie Siguenza

AA Font size + Print

President Obama says the war in Afghanistan will be over at the end of the year, with or without a troop deal from Afghan President Hamid Karzai. By Stephanie Gaskell

President Barack Obama had a message for the American people during his State of the Union speech: the war in Afghanistan will be over at the end of the year. He also had a message for Afghan President Hamid Karzai: Sign the U.S. troop deal or we’re out of there.

After months of warning Karzai that a deal needed to be signed by the end of last year, Obama seems content with putting the ball in Afghanistan’s court. During his fifth State of the Union speech on Tuesday night, the president made it clear that if Karzai signed the deal, which lays out the conditions for American troops to stay past the 2014 withdrawal, a “small force” could stay to carry out training and counter-terrorism operations.

“After 2014, we will support a unified Afghanistan as it takes responsibility for its own future,” Obama said. “If the Afghan government signs a security agreement that we have negotiated, a small force of Americans could remain in Afghanistan with NATO allies to carry out two narrow missions: training and assisting Afghan forces, and counterterrorism operations to pursue any remnants of al Qaeda.  For while our relationship with Afghanistan will change, one thing will not: our resolve that terrorists do not launch attacks against our country.”

(Read more: Obama’s Vision: No More War but Plenty More Fighting)

Obama did not set any deadline for the bilateral security agreement to be signed, nor did he urge Karzai to sign it – a signal that the U.S. may be willing to wait it out. Despite the wishes of military leaders who would like time to plan for a post-war presence, it’s not absolutely necessary. Negotiations for a post-war deal for U.S. troops to stay in Iraq went down to the wire.  

Karzai has been playing politics with the deal since agreeing to it last fall. Presidential elections to replace him are set for April 5, and Obama may just prefer to deal with a new leader. Whatever happens in Afghanistan after the end of the year, one thing is clear: Obama will be the president who brought two of America’s longest wars to a close.

“When I took office, nearly 180,000 Americans were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Today, all our troops are out of Iraq.  More than 60,000 of our troops have already come home from Afghanistan.  With Afghan forces now in the lead for their own security, our troops have moved to a support role. Together with our allies, we will complete our mission there by the end of this year, and America’s longest war will finally be over,” he said.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.