Top General Wants 10,000 U.S. Troops in Afghanistan until 2017

SAF Regional Command North by Lt. j.g. Amy Forsythe

AA Font size + Print

Gen. Joseph Dunford is reportedly pushing a plan to keep 10,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan until 2017. By Stephanie Gaskell

The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan will go to the White House on Monday to recommend keeping 10,000 troops there until 2017, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Gen. Joseph Dunford’s plan reportedly has the support of several key leaders, including Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry, CIA Director John Brennan and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey.

The troops would train Afghan security forces and conduct counter-terrorism operations. All other U.S. forces would leave the country as planned at the end of the year. It’s unclear if President Barack Obama and his National Security Adviser Susan Rice support the plan.

(Read more Defense One coverage of Afghanistan here)

A bilateral security agreement must still be signed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai in order for U.S. troops to stay past 2014. Karzai said he supports U.S. and NATO troops staying past the withdrawal, but he’s stalled on signing the deal ahead of April presidential elections.

“The number is up to Obama to decide,” Karzai spokesman Aimal Faizi told Defense One in December. “It is not the number of troops which matter to us but the nature of their mission. We want future U.S. military presence to be in accordance with the Afghan law and does not violate our sovereignty and the basic rights of our people.”

Hagel said a decision on post-2014 troop levels needs to be made soon, so NATO countries can plan ahead. “You can’t do that at the last minute. There are budgets. There are commitments. You’ve got political constituencies. You’ve got congresses, parliaments, national leaders,” he said, adding that the deal should be in place by the NATO defense ministerial meeting next month.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.