Kerry: NATO Members Must Increase Military Spending

Secretary of State John Kerry preparing to testify in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 8, 2014

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

AA Font size + Print

Secretary of State John Kerry preparing to testify in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 8, 2014

Secretary Kerry, claiming Russia has ‘escalated the crisis even further’ in Ukraine, tells under-spending NATO member states it’s time to pay up. By Ben Watson

In a stern warning from Washington, Secretary of State John Kerry urged NATO members in Europe to increase their defense spending over the next five years in the face of escalated Russian efforts to destabilize Ukraine and “change the security landscape of Eastern and Central Europe.”

“We cannot continue to allow allied defense budgets to shrink,” Kerry said in an address to the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday. “Together we have to push back against those who try to change sovereign borders by force.”

This latest plea from a senior Obama administration official for European capitals to increase defense spending is perhaps one of the most forceful heard in several years, and it may have the greatest chance for traction as Russia continues to defy Western pleas to stand down it’s Ukraine invasion.

For years, NATO has held a standard that members should afford at least 2 percent of their GDP for defense spending. Instead, the U.S. and larger allies foot the vast majority of the bill. U.S. investments currently account for more than 70 percent of NATO military spending, whereas during the Cold War the U.S. tally was closer to 50 percent. While the Soviet Union disintegrated during the first half of the 1990s, European NATO members spent an average of 2.7 percent of GDP on defense. And while the recent global economic recession hit nations like Greece and Portugal particularly hard, the European member state average by 2013 had fallen to 1.6 percent of GDP.

“Clearly not all allies are going to meet the NATO benchmark of two percent of [gross domestic product spending for defense] overnight or even next year,” said Kerry. “But it’s time for allies who are below that level to make credible commitments to increase their spending on defense over the next five years.”

Russia, said Kerry, has taken “not one single step…in any public way that seriously attempts to live by the spirit or the law of what was signed” in the Geneva accord on April 17. “In fact, it’s fair to say they have escalated the crisis even further.”

The Obama administration for years has been frustrated at NATO members’ unwillingness to take the financial burden of European security off Washington’s hands. Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in a scolding final speech at Brussels in 2011, said, “I am the latest in a string of U.S. defense secretaries who have urged allies privately and publicly, often with exasperation, to meet agreed-upon NATO benchmarks for defense spending.” Last September, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said, “European nations can, and should, do more, to match America’s commitment.”

“Together we have to make it absolutely clear to the Kremlin that NATO territory is inviolable,” Kerry said Wednesday. “We will defend every single piece of it. Article 5 of the NATO Treaty must mean something, and our allies on the front lines need and deserve no less.”

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.