Here’s What You Need to Know About Thailand’s Military Coup

Thai soldiers patrol near an anti-government demonstration in Bangkok on May 22, 2014.

Sakchai Lalit/AP

AA Font size + Print

Thai soldiers patrol near an anti-government demonstration in Bangkok on May 22, 2014.

U.S. officials are keeping a close eye on the action since a formal coup could significantly impact U.S.-Thai military relations. By Matt Vasilogambros

The Thai army led a coup d’état on Thursday, assuming control of a government that has struggled through a political crisis for several months.

The man behind the coup, Thailand’s army chief, Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, said it was “necessary to seize power,” announcing the coup on television. Thousands of protesters immediately took to the streets, a familiar sight echoing the past six months of political instability.

Since December, 28 people have been killed and hundreds more wounded in the ongoing protests.

While the military says this move is merely meant to temporarily “reform the political structure, the economy and society,” it remains unclear how long the army will maintain its hold in the Southeast Asian nation. Rival political factions have been unable to agree on a way to govern moving forward.

Political tensions have been rising in the country for some time. On May 7, the Constitutional Court ordered Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra to step down from power following allegations of corruption and graft. Yingluck, 46, was the country’s first female prime minister.

But to get a sense of how long this current coup will last, look no further than the last coup, which took place in 2006.

Then, the military ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, the brother of Thailand’s recent leader. He currently lives in exile. The military remained in power for over a year.

In his announcement, Prayuth noted also that the coup was to “worship and protect the monarchy,” alluding to the country’s ailing 86-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Thailand is a constitutional monarchy.

This is Thailand’s 12th successful coup since 1932, when the country’s absolute monarchy dissolved. There have been seven other attempted coups.

In response to the military declaring martial law in Thailand earlier this week, the White House gave a cookie-cutter response fit for any country vaguely in this situation. Press secretary Jay Carney said the U.S. is monitoring the situation and is very concerned about the political crisis.

The U.S. firmly believes that all parties must exercise restraint and work together to resolve differences through peaceful dialogue to find a way forward,” Carney told reporters at Tuesday’s daily briefing. “This development underscores the need for elections to determine the will of the Thai people.”

At the heart of the political tensions are two groups. CNN explains:

Those are the so-called yellow shirts, predominately urban, middle-class supporters of the royalist establishment. They’ve been staging massive protests in the country’s capital for months and boycotted elections in February.

Backing the government are the so-called red shirts, many of whom hail from the country’s rural north and northeast.

This is the latest ouster in a series of political crises around the world, from Egypt to Ukraine.


Secretary of State John Kerry later on Thursday said he was “disappointed” with the decision by the military to stage a coup and suspend the constitution of Thailand, saying, “There is no justification” for it.

I am concerned by reports that senior political leaders of Thailand’s major parties have been detained and call for their release,” Kerry said in a statement. “I am also concerned that media outlets have been shut down. I urge the restoration of civilian government immediately, a return to democracy, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, such as press freedoms.”

Additionally, Kerry called for new elections. While he noted the “long friendship” with the Thai people, Kerry said this will have “negative implications” for the relationship between the U.S. and Thailand, considering the U.S. law that restricts military assistance to countries that stage coups.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.