Obama Wants a New $5 Billion Fund for the Global War on Terror

Supporters of the al-Qaeda-linked militant group Ansar al-Shariah burn an American flag in Benghazi, Libya in October.

AP Photo/Mohammed el-Shaiky

AA Font size + Print

Supporters of the al-Qaeda-linked militant group Ansar al-Shariah burn an American flag in Benghazi, Libya in October.

With the war in Afghanistan ending, the Overseas Contingency Operations budget won't cut it anymore, so Obama is proposing a new $5 billion fund to pay for the global war on terrorism. By Global Security Newswire

U.S. President Obama on Wednesday outlined a plan to establish a multibillion-dollar fund to underwrite counterterrorism trainings with other nations.

In a speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Obama urged Congress to provide as much as $5 billion to establish a new Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund. The program would finance U.S. efforts to enhance the capacity of partner states such as Lebanon and Iraq to combat regional extremists, the New York Times reported.

Obama warned that the terrorism threat has become more widespread, with new al-Qaida affiliates emerging in Mali, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere.

We have to develop a strategy that matches this diffuse threat; one that expands our reach without sending forces that stretch our military too thin, or stirs up local resentments,” Obama stated. “We need partners to fight terrorists alongside us.”

He warned that “for the foreseeable future, the most direct threat to America at home and abroad remains terrorism.”

The odds that Congress would budget money for the proposed fund in the short term do not appear good, however, the Daily Beast reported.

The new reserve is to be added to the Defense Department’s fiscal 2015 budget request and draw from the vast Overseas Contingency Operations fund, which is not part of the Pentagon’s base budget, according to the Daily Beast article. Analysts and ex-officials say the counterterrorism monies might not be approved if administration officials do not provide lawmakers with specific information about what the money will be used for and why it cannot come out of the department’s core budget.

That key lawmakers were not given a heads-up about the administration’s additional budget request also could play a role. None of the senior appropriators from either the Republican or Democratic side in the House and Senate said they had any knowledge about the counterterrorism fund before its announcement, the Daily Beast reports.

The administration has already asked for nearly $8 billion in International Security Assistance funding, which includes both international military training and financing programs,” Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • GBC Issue Brief: Supply Chain Insecurity

    Federal organizations rely on state-of-the-art IT tools and systems to deliver services efficiently and effectively, and it takes a vast ecosystem of organizations, individuals, information, and resources to successfully deliver these products. This issue brief discusses the current threats to the vulnerable supply chain - and how agencies can prevent these threats to produce a more secure IT supply chain process.

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.