Obama Wants a New $5 Billion Fund for the Global War on Terror

Supporters of the al-Qaeda-linked militant group Ansar al-Shariah burn an American flag in Benghazi, Libya in October.

AP Photo/Mohammed el-Shaiky

AA Font size + Print

Supporters of the al-Qaeda-linked militant group Ansar al-Shariah burn an American flag in Benghazi, Libya in October.

With the war in Afghanistan ending, the Overseas Contingency Operations budget won't cut it anymore, so Obama is proposing a new $5 billion fund to pay for the global war on terrorism. By Global Security Newswire

U.S. President Obama on Wednesday outlined a plan to establish a multibillion-dollar fund to underwrite counterterrorism trainings with other nations.

In a speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Obama urged Congress to provide as much as $5 billion to establish a new Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund. The program would finance U.S. efforts to enhance the capacity of partner states such as Lebanon and Iraq to combat regional extremists, the New York Times reported.

Obama warned that the terrorism threat has become more widespread, with new al-Qaida affiliates emerging in Mali, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere.

We have to develop a strategy that matches this diffuse threat; one that expands our reach without sending forces that stretch our military too thin, or stirs up local resentments,” Obama stated. “We need partners to fight terrorists alongside us.”

He warned that “for the foreseeable future, the most direct threat to America at home and abroad remains terrorism.”

The odds that Congress would budget money for the proposed fund in the short term do not appear good, however, the Daily Beast reported.

The new reserve is to be added to the Defense Department’s fiscal 2015 budget request and draw from the vast Overseas Contingency Operations fund, which is not part of the Pentagon’s base budget, according to the Daily Beast article. Analysts and ex-officials say the counterterrorism monies might not be approved if administration officials do not provide lawmakers with specific information about what the money will be used for and why it cannot come out of the department’s core budget.

That key lawmakers were not given a heads-up about the administration’s additional budget request also could play a role. None of the senior appropriators from either the Republican or Democratic side in the House and Senate said they had any knowledge about the counterterrorism fund before its announcement, the Daily Beast reports.

The administration has already asked for nearly $8 billion in International Security Assistance funding, which includes both international military training and financing programs,” Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from DefenseOne.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • Military Readiness: Ensuring Readiness with Analytic Insight

    To determine military readiness, decision makers in defense organizations must develop an understanding of complex inter-relationships among readiness variables. For example, how will an anticipated change in a readiness input really impact readiness at the unit level and, equally important, how will it impact readiness outside of the unit? Learn how to form a more sophisticated and accurate understanding of readiness and make decisions in a timely and cost-effective manner.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Information Operations: Retaking the High Ground

    Today's threats are fluent in rapidly evolving areas of the Internet, especially social media. Learn how military organizations can secure an advantage in this developing arena.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.