DoD Workers Want More of Everything In Fight Against ISIS, Except Ground Troops

Iraqi anti-terrorism soldiers guard a graduation ceremony of Sunni tribal volunteers joining Iraqi security forces in the town of Amiriyat al-Fallujah, west of Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, May 8, 2015.

Hadi Mizban/AP

AA Font size + Print

Iraqi anti-terrorism soldiers guard a graduation ceremony of Sunni tribal volunteers joining Iraqi security forces in the town of Amiriyat al-Fallujah, west of Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, May 8, 2015.

Defense One/GBC Poll finds frustration but little appetite for boots on the ground.

The paradox of ISIS war frustrations is starkly revealed in a new poll of senior national security workers who want to do more of everything the Obama administration is already doing to defeat the terrorist organization, except send U.S. troops.

A vast majority of respondents — mostly senior Defense Department workers and some U.S. troops — say “not enough” is being done to defeat the Islamic State, or ISIS. But only one-third supported sending additional U.S. ground troops to do anything about it, according to a new Defense One/GBC survey.

The results of the poll, conducted May 7, shows that respondents are increasingly frustrated with the war in Iraq and Syria, but also that they reject the kind of U.S. military intervention whose support is rising among the broader American public.

Only 16 percent agreed that U.S.-led campaign against ISIS is doing enough to defeat that organization, but just 31 percent backed putting more “boots on the ground.”

In the past week, the war has delivered a victory and a loss. U.S. Army special operations forces entered Syria, killed a dozen enemy fighters including the purported head of finances for ISIS, captured his wife and a trove of intelligence information, and freed a captive Iraqi woman. But by Monday, ISIS fighters had captured Ramadi, the Iraqi city in Anbar province where thousands of U.S. troops fought and many died.

Obama administration critics have pounced on the fall of Ramadi, saying the president has not taken ISIS seriously enough and needs intervene more forcefully in Iraq.

For DoD workers, however, it’s not a question of whether ISIS is a threat; it’s what to do about it next. Of the survey respondents, 88 percent agree that ISIS presents an imminent threat to the United States. More than half of all respondents “strongly agree.”

When asked what else the U.S. should do to counter ISIS, the leading responses are actions the Obama administration already is taking. The top answers, and respondents were allowed to chose more than one, were: “pressure allies to take on more of the fight,” 69%; “increase airstrikes,” 52%; “increase military assistance to regional allies,” 51%; “amplify messaging to counter ISIS propaganda,” 49%; and “create and enforce a no-fly zone over Syria,” 34%. The option for putting more boots on the ground came in dead last.

Government Business Council, a division of Atlantic Media, the parent company of Defense One, polled a random sample of print and online subscribers to Government Executive, Nextgov, and Defense One. On May 7, 477 personnel representing the Defense Department and military service branches completed the survey, including those at the GS/GM-11 to 15 grade levels, active duty military personnel, and members of the Senior Executive Service. Of those respondents, 70 percent are ranked GS/GM-12 or military equivalent and above, 97 percent are Defense Department civilians, and 3 percent are active-duty military personnel.

Close [ x ] More from DefenseOne

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Top 5 Findings: Security of Internet of Things To Be Mission-Critical

    As federal agencies increasingly leverage these capabilities, government security stakeholders now must manage and secure a growing number of devices, including those being used remotely at the “edge” of networks in a variety of locations. With such security concerns in mind, Government Business Council undertook an indepth research study of federal government leaders in January 2017. Here are five of the key takeaways below which, taken together, paint a portrait of a government that is increasingly cognizant and concerned for the future security of IoT.

  • Coordinating Incident Response on Posts, Camps and Stations

    Effective incident response on posts, camps, and stations is an increasingly complex challenge. An effective response calls for seamless conversations between multiple stakeholders on the base and beyond its borders with civilian law enforcement and emergency services personnel. This whitepaper discusses what a modern dispatch solution looks like -- one that brings together diverse channels and media, simplifies the dispatch environment and addresses technical integration challenges to ensure next generation safety and response on Department of Defense posts, camps and stations.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.